...Hillary Clinton is trying to regain her place in the White House, only at that big desk this time around. The Hillary Clinton machine. And when we talk about the Clinton machine, we're not just talking about the corporate sectors of their party but also the media. They see the Donald Trump candidacy as a historic opportunity for them to build a big tent party; one that will include millions of what they hope to be, Republican refugees from Trump and also an opportunity to unite the corporate world around a defense of neoliberal austerity at home and endless wars, imperialist wars abroad.
When you're talking about that, Hillary and Bill are the couple. Hillary was the chief advocate of the regime change war that overthrew Muammar Gaddafi. We all remember her saying we came, we saw, he died. And she is the person most responsible, outside of Obama himself, for the death of hundreds of thousands of Syrians. Her husband was the president who sent the bankers free to wreck the world economy finally in 2008, and she says she will rely on Bill for economic advice. So there we have it, the Wall Street imperialist war couple, and they are going to unite the corporate world around Hillary's candidacy. It's already happening and that's why Donald Trump is having trouble getting the big bucks from the usual suspects among the wealthy contributors. They are already or will soon be sending that money to Hillary.
The Republican party thus has already been destabilized and that means the duopoly is quite wobbly. Hillary Clinton and her husband Bill and the rest of the corporate Democrats want to capitalize on that destabilization. .... But it will destabilize their part of the duopoly as well. Right now Hillary is chomping at the bit to pull in the Republican voters that she wants to pull under her big tent. She talked about her frustrations on Sunday as she said that Bernie Sanders’ campaign is preventing her from talking to those good thinking Republicans as well as Democrats and Independents and she wants to attack Trump as being a not so good business man that doesn't show his tax returns. Her campaign is going to be essentially a defense of the status quo and she's going to talk about Donald Trump's craziness and his unpredictability. I believe, and the polls do not show this, but I think Hillary Clinton is going to win this election by a landslide and attempt to build this big tent. But I don't think that this is going to save the duopoly system.
Donald Trump's white nationalist rights represent I think about 30% of the white electorate. The leftish voters who have supported Bernie Sanders represent about the same portion of people among white folks. Both of these groups need and want their own political parties and I think they're going to get them in the aftermath of this election. The Republicans, that is the Donald Trump Republicans, already think they have theirs although that is likely to be taken away from them, who knows how that will go down. But Bernie Sanders is not going to run as an indie so these leftish voters are not going to have a major party alternative, they'll have to vote for the Green party if they're serious about not being Democrats.
But after the election we will see some kind of social democratic formation coming together. However, most black folks will not be in that new constellation that replaces the duopoly. They will remain loyal in the main. Although young black folks are show that they're not so lopped in with the party. But mainly blacks will remain loyal to the Democrats until they perceive that the Republicans have been so wounded that they are no longer such a monolith and that they are not an overarching threat and then they as the real social democratic voting constituency in the United States will also move to these new formations. So in the long run, the duopoly is doomed.

Hillary Clinton’s efforts to move on from a damaging email controversy suffered their biggest setback yet on Wednesday with the release of an internal report finding she broke multiple government rules by using a private server rather than more secure official communication systems.

The 78-page investigation by the inspector general of the state department singled out several previously unknown breaches by Clinton while she was secretary of state, including the use of mobile devices to conduct official business without checking whether they posed a security risk.

The State Department’s independent watchdog has issued a highly critical analysis of Hillary Clinton’s email practices while running the department, concluding that Clinton failed to seek legal approval for her use of a private server and that agency staff members would not have given their blessing if it had been sought because of “security risks.”...

...The IG’s office also found several incidents in which Clinton or people around her expressed fear that the server, which was stored in the Clintons’ New York home and shared by the couple, might have been hacked. The report cites a January 2011 email in which a Bill Clinton staffer wrote a Hillary Clinton aide to say he had shut down the server because he believed “someone was trying to hack us.”

A Clinton match-up is highly likely to be an unmitigated electoral disaster, whereas a Sanders candidacy stands a far better chance. Every one of Clinton’s (considerable) weaknesses plays to every one of Trump’s strengths, whereas every one of Trump’s (few) weaknesses plays to every one of Sanders’s strengths. From a purely pragmatic standpoint, running Clinton against Trump is a disastrous, suicidal proposition.

George Zimmerman has listed the gun with which he killed Trayvon Martin in 2012 for auction, touting it as “your opportunity to own a piece of American history”.