Source:
Reuters WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives failed on Wednesday to round up enough votes for a bill scaling back various financial reforms, a surprising defeat in an area conservatives hoped to prioritize this year.
... Before the vote on Wednesday, Democrats slammed the bill as a Republican effort to chip away at the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial law, including one provision that would have given banks extra time to comply with part of the Volcker rule.
... The most controversial aspect of the proposal was the section related to the Volcker rule, which bans banks from making risky trades with their own money and prohibits certain investments in financial products.
The bill gave banks more time to exit positions in collateralized loan obligations, or CLOs, which are essentially bundles of business loans. Banks had complained that they would have to quickly abandon those investments.
Read more:
http://news.yahoo.com/u-house-fails-approve-bill-diluting-dodd-frank-204253008--sector.html
[font color = red]On Edit[/font] (thanks Sunseeker in #3) "The GOP used a procedure called a "suspension" that requires a 2/3 vote. So their majority was not enough. "
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/house-republicans-jobs-regulation-reform-bill-fails-suspension
(The above doesn't explain why the GOP chose to do the above, sigh. One question leads to another. Maybe Boner can't count.)
Anyway, great news, although probably Dodd-Frank, as watered down as it already is, will be insufficient to prevent another derivatives meltdown.
[font color = red]More on Edit:[/font]
PoliticAverse in #5 has the rollcall link (35 Democrats voted for and 1 Republican voted against)
See:
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2015/roll009.xml
DCBob in #7 explains why the Repubs might have gone this route --