May 28, 2012

Veterans and the Veterans Administration: Part 1

I'm a veteran; a veteran of the foolish Vietnam war. I was in country when Tet of 68 started and I was in the invasion of Cambodia in April 1970. I have two Bronze Stars from my two tours of Vietnam as an REMF. For those of you who don't know what an REMF is, it stands for Rear Echelon Mother Fucker. I was in the 'rear', whatever that means. I got shot at, mortared, rocketed and had the shit scared out of me more times than I care to remember. I fixed radios, mine detectors, starlight scopes and pretty much anything that had electronics in it.

As near as I can tell I received my Bronze Stars for not fucking up too bad. How twisted is that? I get free automobile license plates from the state of Massachusetts for not fucking up too bad.

As many of you know, I try to read the military rags on a regular basis. Apparently the Veterans Administration (even with Shinseki in command) has been able to make little progress taking care of our latest batch of war veterans. A little side note here: I admire the women and men of the Veterans Administration - they are some of the most dedicated and selfless people when it comes to taking are of veterans. And taking care of veterans is honoring the promise that the United States made to soldiers when they enlisted. And the Veterans Administration does its best trying to take care of our veterans.

Things at the Veterans Administration are not going all that well. The Veterans Administration set some benchmarks for themselves and are having a hard time meeting the goals they set for themselves. More on that later.

This Raw Story article kicked my juices into high gear:





http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/05/27/record-45-of-iraq-and-afghanistan-vets-have-filed-for-disability/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story%29
Record 45% of Iraq and Afghanistan vets have filed for disability
By Muriel Kane
Sunday, May 27, 2012 20:11 EDT

According to a new report from the Associated Press, a record 45% of the 1.6 million veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are seeking compensation for service-related injuries.

This is more than double the rate for Gulf War veterans. For all the publicity given to “Gulf War syndrome,” only an estimated 21% of the veterans of that conflict have filed disability claims.

The recent applicants are also citing a much larger number of ailments than veterans of previous wars — an average of eight or nine per person, which has shot up over the past year to 11 to 14. This compares to less than four for Vietnam War veterans who are currently receiving compensation, and just two for veterans of World War II and Korea.

The causes of the increase, and to what extent it simply reflects the poor economy, are not clear. “Government officials and some veterans’ advocates say that veterans who might have been able to work with certain disabilities may be more inclined to seek benefits now because they lost jobs or can’t find any,” the AP explains.



PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder) and TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury) are the signature wounds of the Iraq and Afghanistan adventures. Not amputations, not genital mutilations, not disfigurements, not heart/lung diseases, not electrocutions; PTSD and TBI.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ptsd
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traumatic_brain_injury



Which leads us back to the Veterans Administration. Eric Shinseki made a speech to the American Legion on March 22, 2011 stating his charge:

http://www.va.gov/opa/bios/secretary.asp

he Honorable Eric K. Shinseki
The American Legion Mid-Winter Conference
Washington, DC
March 22, 2011

National Commander Foster—Thank you for that kind introduction, and for the invitation to join you today.

Let me also acknowledge your Vice Commanders: Russell Henry, Midwest Region; Gene Pytka, Northeast Region; Bill Schrier, Western Region; John Mella, Central Region; and Carlos Orria-Medina, Southeast Region.

Peter Gaytan, your Executive Director, and Dan Wheeler, your Adjutant.
Dan Dellinger, National Legislative Chairman.
Carlene Ashworth, Auxiliary President
National Commander, David Dew, Sons of The American Legion.

Let me congratulate your honorees, Congressman Jason Altmire and Senator Daniel Akaka. Each has been a tremendous supporter and tireless worker on behalf of Veterans and their families, and survivors. They are most deserving of your recognition. Congratulations to them, once again.

Members of the Legion.
Fellow Veterans.
Other distinguished guests, including assistant secretary Ray Jefferson.
Ladies and gentlemen.

I salute the Legion’s longstanding devotion to our Nation’s Veterans.

Last week, I attended the funeral of Frank Buckles, who enlisted in the Army at age 16—the last known American Veteran of the War to End All Wars. When asked, in his later years, why he lied about his age to serve in World War I, he said: “If your country needs you, you should be right there; that is the way I felt when I was young, and that’s the way I feel today.”

On the eve of battle during World War II, Marine Lieutenant Anthony Turtora, wrote his family: “Always pray, not that I shall come back, but that I will have the courage to do my duty.” Killed in the battle at Guadalcanal, Lieutenant Turtora joined, what is today, the more than one million Americans who have, throughout the nearly 235-year history of our republic, placed their most precious gifts on the altar of freedom.

With your help and support, 2010 was a good year for Veterans. For two years now, we have been teaching three fundamental behaviors and three key priorities—six simple rules of thumb.

The three behaviors: First, people-centric. We serve Veterans, and people count. They must be properly trained, properly motivated, with the right attitudes, and enjoy inspiring leadership.

Next, results oriented. We must be able to measure return on any investments we make. If we can’t measure, we won’t invest.

Finally, forward-looking. We look out five years to envision the VA we will need—in terms of training, equipment, and leadership, if we are to better serve Veterans—and decide how to get there.

These three key behaviors are focused on the three key priorities we have been emphasizing for the past two years now: Increase Veteran access to VA benefits and services now; reduce and, ultimately, eliminate the backlog in disability claims in 2014; and finally, end Veterans homelessness by 2015.

Three fundamental behaviors—people-centric, results oriented, forward-looking. And three key priorities—access, backlog, homelessness. We have momentum in each of these initiatives and expect to see major deliverables over the next two years.

On 14 February, President Obama submitted his 2012 budget and 2013 advance appropriations requests, and in doing so, kept his promise to care for those who have safeguarded this Nation. His budget requests $132.2 billion in 2012—$61.9 billion in discretionary funding and $70.3 billion in mandatory funding. Our discretionary budget request represents an increase of $5.9 billion, or 10.6 percent, over the 2010 enacted budget.

While each document—budget request and advance appropriations request—is important enough on its own, taken together, they are powerful in terms of energy, opportunity, and continuity thanks to Congress’ granting the advance appropriations authority on which you worked so hard. So, while VBA, benefits, and NCA, cemeteries, like other departments and agencies all across government, are dealing with a continuing resolution, VHA is fully funded to deliver healthcare to Veterans throughout 2011.

It’s often noted that less than 1 percent of Americans serve in our military. Those who do allow the rest of us to do what Americans do best—and that’s out-think, out-create, out-work, and out-produce the rest of the world. They help unleash our powerful economic engine, enabling us to do what we’ve historically done—and that’s win.

I know the economy has lost a bit of sparkle for the moment, but I trust the instincts, the energy, the creativity, and the intellect of the American people to get us back on course. President Obama has challenged us to win the future by out-innovating, out-educating, and out-building our competition, and this budget helps Veterans and VA do our part.
Today, our military remains operationally deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan—conflicts that have been underway for most of the past decade. The burden on our magnificent all-volunteer force and its families to accomplish every mission—without failure, fanfare, or complaint—has been enormous.

And as they redeploy home, and return to their communities, the Nation must find ways to offer them the opportunity to add their substantial skills, knowledge, and attributes to that powerful economic engine.

VA’s mission is crucial to their transition home. As President Lincoln reminded us 146 years ago, we “care for [those] who have borne the battle and [their spouses] and orphan[s].”

Those requirements and responsibilities have grown as we addressed longstanding issues from past wars—Agent Orange, Gulf War Illness, combat PTSD—and watched the injuries and illnesses from the current conflicts grow significantly. These numbers will continue to rise for many years, perhaps decades, after the last American combatant departs Iraq and Afghanistan. You understand this reality. You have lived it, and we must ensure that the lessons of that history are not forgotten.

VA is a large organization with a correspondingly large budget and diverse and complex mission. We provide healthcare, disability benefits, pensions, home loans, life insurance, and educational assistance, and run the Nation’s largest cemetery system, which has outperformed every other enterprise in this country for the past decade—public or private, profit or non-profit.

Some ask, why is the VA enterprise so large and complex? Why is the federal government doing so many things for Veterans? Simple. Because in times past, those who wore our Nation’s uniforms were often unable to either acquire, or afford, these services on their own. No one would provide them. And so, VA has been missioned to deliver the promises of presidents and meet the obligations of the American people.

At present, about 8.4 million Veterans receive VA medical care and benefits. But another 14.3 million Veterans and 35 million spouses and adult children, who do not receive such care and benefits, still see themselves as Veterans or parts of Veterans’ families, whether or not they ever visit our medical centers or apply for disability. They expect us to get things right for the Veterans we do serve.

Over the next two years, we intend to produce the following deliverables:

Homelessness. President Obama strongly supports ending Veteran homelessness by 2015. Two years ago, there were approximately 131,000 homeless Veterans on any given night. Today, we estimate there are about 76,000 homeless Veterans. We intend to take this below 60,000 by June of next year, and end Veteran homelessness by 2015.

The 2012 budget includes $939 million to prevent and reduce homelessness among Veterans, an increase of 17.5 percent, or $140 million over 2011.

A comprehensive review is underway to use VA’s inventory of vacant or under-utilized buildings to house homeless and at-risk Veterans and their families. VA has identified 94 sites which will potentially add another 6,300 units of housing through public/private ventures using VA’s enhanced-use lease authority. This EUL authority is scheduled to lapse at the end of calendar year 2011, and its re-authorization by Congress is needed to continue increasing housing for homeless Veterans and their families. We are asking Congress to help us here.

The most flexible and responsive housing option remains the HUD-VASH voucher, on which we work closely with the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Both Secretary Donovan and I endorse the importance of this joint effort. HUD-VASH vouchers are our only option, at the moment, for housing Veterans with families.

The claims backlog. In 2009, we produced 977,000 claims decisions, but took in one million claims in return. In 2010, for the first time, we produced a million claims decisions, but took in 1.2 million claims. We expect 1.45 million claims to be submitted this year and know that we will produce another record in claims decisions—but still fall short. This growth is tied, in part, to the economic downturn. The numbers are so large that merely hiring more claims processors won’t allow us to dominate the growth. We must automate, and quickly. The 2012 budget request for VBA is $2 billion, an increase of $330 million, or 19.5 percent, over the 2010 budget.

These funds are needed to get us out of paper and into electronic processing, something that should have happened two decades ago. Automation alone is not enough, we must also increase accuracy—today 84 percent, 2015—98 percent. We have a host of promising options being piloted today. We expect them to begin paying off next year as we begin moving to fully automate the disability claims process. The president’s budget request for VBA provides $148 million to complete pilot testing and fielding of our paperless Veterans Benefits Management System.

The GI Bill. The budget request supports expanded eligibility for Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits by including non-college degree programs, such as on-the-job training, flight training, and correspondence courses. It also funds full automation of the payment process by the end of this calendar year, speeding tuition and housing payments to eligible Veterans. Through October 2010, VA issued over $7 billion in tuition, housing, and stipends to more than 423,000 student-Veterans and eligible family members. When all educational initiatives are rolled together, enrollments grow to over 800,000 Veterans and family members in college. This program is working thanks to Congress’ generosity.

Mental health. This budget request seeks nearly $51 billion for medical care, including $6.2 billion for critically required mental health programs—$68 million directly to our suicide prevention initiatives alone. Our focus is on treatment for post-traumatic stress, traumatic brain injury, and other psychological and cognitive health requirements, as well as greater collaboration between the Departments of Defense and VA to seamlessly provide mental healthcare.

In addition to these major initiatives, the new budget recognizes the tremendous responsibilities and financial burdens assumed by Veterans’ caregivers, and provides funding for specialized training, stipends, healthcare, and mental health services. It is hard to overstate the tremendous sacrifices they make every day to help all Veterans. They are VA’s historic and mission-critical partners, deserving of our continued support, assistance, and gratitude.

The new budget also invests in the healthcare needs of women Veterans, wherever they seek care. It provides operations and maintenance funding to NCA to establish a new standard for providing nearly 90 percent of the Veteran population a burial site within 75 miles of their homes. Finally, the 2012 budget request continues robust funding for the rural health initiatives we funded in 2009, 2010, and 2011.

Let me close with a reminder about why VA must look beyond today and position itself for its responsibilities over the coming decade. On 26 march 2010, Marine Corporal Todd Nicely, walking point for his squad near Lakari, Afghanistan, tripped a 40-pound, pressure-detonated IED [improvised explosive device], ripping off his body armor and helmet, tearing off his right leg and left hand, and ultimately costing him his left leg and right arm as well.

Amazingly resilient through innumerable surgeries, Todd Nicely is one of our Nation’s three surviving quadruple amputees from Iraq and Afghanistan. The Washington Post recently told his incredible story of survival, adjustment, love, and support—but at its core, it described a Marine with the heart of a lion. What shines through are Todd’s resilience, humility, strength of character, and an incredibly positive attitude from somewhere deep within.

“I remember screaming once or twice. You know, those bloodcurdling screams they do in the movies,” he recounted of the moments immediately after the IED went off, “and I remember thinking to myself, ‘don’t do that again, because this is the last image that these boys are going to have of you in their heads. So stay strong.’ After that, I just shut up.”

At their reunion at Bethesda, his 24-year-old wife, Crystal—a wonderful woman every bit as tough as her husband—asked him if he knew his legs were missing. He said he did. She then asked him if he knew that his hands were also missing. He said “No.” He was quiet for a moment, then asked, “Did anybody else get hurt?” Crystal said “No.” His response was one word—“Good.”

During an awards ceremony at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, with members of his unit present, Lieutenant Colonel McDonough, Todd’s battalion commander, said that he hoped that his own children might one day have the courage of Corporal Nicely. When it was his turn to speak, Todd said simply, “I’d just like to thank everybody. I’d like to thank my platoon for getting me back. If it wasn’t for you guys, I don’t think I’d be alive today. Other than that, I really don’t have much more to say. I love you guys.”

Todd Nicely’s toughness, his courage, concern for squad mates—even when his own life hung in the balance—and his quiet humility are hallmarks we have witnessed time and again amongst this generation of warriors, and warriors of previous generations. Whatever Service we come from, all of us can see in Todd Nicely and his actions the essence of the Marine Corps—Semper Fidelis, “Always Faithful.”

I am told “polytrauma” was not a word until this conflict. Todd Nicely, and others like him, is going to need VA for a long time. We must posture VA for the future we can already see today. We must remain “always faithful” to the men and women who have gone into harm’s way on our behalf.

We have come a long ways over the past 26 months, but we have a lot more work to do. My report to you today underscores the fact that this administration, VA itself, and our partners like The American Legion, will spare no effort in serving the generations of men and women whose love of freedom, and dedication to democracy, have raised America up to greatness.

I look forward to working with you in our mutual calling. May God bless all who serve and have served in uniform. And may God continue to bless this wonderful country of ours. Thank you.



On May 23, 2012, the Army Times posted an article:

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2012/05/military-waits-get-longer-for-disability-benefits-052312w/

Wait gets longer for VA disability benefits
By Patricia Kime - Staff writer
Posted : Wednesday May 23, 2012 17:34:55 EDT

Ill or injured service members now wait an average of 394 days to move through the military’s disability evaluation process, an increase of more than 10 percent since 2010 and well off the goal of 295 days, according to the Government Accountability Office.


If you were to read that article, you would find out:

* Fort Belvoir soldiers wait an average processing time of 537 days to get a determination of their military disability.
* Guardsmen at Fort Carson wait an average processing time of 651 days to get a determination of their military disability.
* IDES (Integrated Disability Evaluation System) was designed/implemented in 2008 to address the issue of long wait times at the Veterans Administration.

So what happened? Unfortunately:


http://www.stripes.com/news/gao-military-s-disability-evaluation-system-has-gotten-steadily-slower-1.178115

GAO: Military's disability evaluation system has gotten steadily slower
By Leo Shane III
Stars and Stripes
Published: May 23, 2012

According to the Government Accountability Office, in 2011 those cases averaged 394 days for wounded active-duty troops and 420 days for wounded reservists, both more than 100 days longer than officials’ stated goals and months longer than they took in 2009.



Veterans and their families are left out in the cold. The veteran has seen the elephant and is not the same person who went to war and the United States has not been fulfilling to promise made to them when they enlisted.


My generation's war was Vietnam. We had fucked up veterans for years after 1975: homeless veterans, drug-addled veterans, alcoholic veterans, incarcerated veterans, veterans who have turned to peace and veterans who think we should have nuked Vietnam.

Afghanistan is a lost cause as was Vietnam. We hear reports of 'progress' and military commanders are 'optimistic'. And yet one fact remains: the last person to conquer Afghanistan was Genghis Khan in 1219. I doubt we can drone our way into the record books.

Let me leave you with the picture by Lady Jane Butler. Her haunting painting, “The Retreat from Kabul, ” shows the sole survivor of a British army of 16,500, Dr. William Brydon, struggling out of Afghanistan in January, 1842. All the rest were killed by Afghan tribesmen after a futile attempt to garrison Kabul.




http://smirkingchimp.com/thread/eric-margolis/43429/facing-the-writing-on-the-wall-in-kabul

Facing the Writing on the Wall in Kabul
by Eric Margolis | May 27, 2012 - 10:33am

One of my favorite artists was the superb Victorian painter Lady Jane Butler who captured in oil the triumphs and tragedies of the British Empire.

Her haunting painting, “The Retreat from Kabul, ” shows the sole survivor of a British army of 16,500, Dr. William Brydon, struggling out of Afghanistan in January, 1842. All the rest were killed by Afghan tribesmen after a futile attempt to garrison Kabul.

This gripping painting should have hung over the NATO summit meeting last week in Chicago to remind the US and its allies that Afghanistan remains “the graveyard of empires.”

The latest empire to try to conquer Afghanistan has failed, and is now sounding the retreat.



If you're interested in reading more about the first British invasion of Afghanistan, I recommend you read:




And lastly I ask: Why are we there?

May 27, 2012

The slow-motion Tet of 2012 continues

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/26/afghanistan-roads-idUSL4E8GQ03120120526

Afghan road lifelines blocked by graft, kickbacks
By Hamid Shalizi
KABUL | Sat May 26, 2012 5:53am EDT

May 26 (Reuters) - When the Afghan government unveiled plans for a road linking his small village to larger centres elsewhere, Rahmanullah was so enthusiastic he offered a section of his farm for the route, thinking it would help move his produce to larger markets.

~snip~

But two years on and Rahmanullah's farming land has gone and the road has largely disintegrated, along with the hopes of local people for a less hardscrabble life in a province where the insurgency offers much-needed money for fighters.

~snip~

"I gave my farming field for free to the builders to give us a road and this is the result," Rahmanullah said, glumly pointing to a cratered and crumbling surface snaking from his village.

~snip~

More than $57 billion has been spent on Afghanistan's reconstruction since the toppling of the former Taliban government in 2001, but critics says millions of dollars have been misspent as donor aid is parachuted on to an opaque maze of local and international contractors.

May 26, 2012

U.S. sailor is 3,000th Afghanistan war death

Petty Officer 1st Class Ryan J. Wilson, 26, is the 1,974th U.S. death in the war.

http://us.cnn.com/2012/05/25/us/afghanistan-war-deaths/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
U.S. sailor is 3,000th Afghanistan war death
By the CNN Wire Staff
updated 5:32 PM EDT, Fri May 25, 2012

CNN) -- A U.S. sailor who died last week of medical complications was the 3,000th death among coalition forces in the Afghanistan war, according to CNN's count based on information provided by the U.S. Defense Department and the International Security Assistance Force.

Petty Officer 1st Class Ryan J. Wilson, 26, of Shasta, California, died May 20 in Manama, Bahrain, the Defense Department reported in an e-mail Friday.

Wilson, assigned to U.S. Naval Forces Central Command in Bahrain, was supporting the Afghanistan mission, the e-mail said.

He was the 1,974th U.S. death in the war that started October 7, 2001, and the 3,000th overall death from the U.S.-led international coalition engaged in Operation Enduring Freedom.



unhappycamper comment: Our Nobel Peace Prize President is responsible for at least 1,337 of the total number of American deaths in Afghanistan since February 2009 --> http://icasualties.org/OEF/ByMonth.aspx

I'm puzzled with the "Stay the course" message. Staying the course while the slow-motion Tet of 2012 continues in Afghanistan seems somewhat westmorelandish to me - remember when the US Army proudly declared that the town of Marjah was finally pacified in 2005/2006? Moving forward to 2012, Afghanistan sure looks like the Vietnam I experienced -->
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ben-anderson/transition-to-what-our-ro_b_1471269.html
http://www.stripes.com/news/afghan-market-flourishing-with-coalition-goods-1.178460

I'm also puzzled with President Obama's military budget as well as his stance on drones to kill people around the world. Granted $160,000 isn't all that much for a Hellfire missile but I do not think it's appropriate to kill people because we don't 'like' them.

May 19, 2012

Remember those $600 toilet seats?

Six hundred dollars ain't shit; Black Hawk helicopters are getting a $17,000 oil/tranny fluid drip pan.




http://www.stripes.com/news/army/earmark-puts-17-000-drip-pans-on-army-helicopter-1.177610
Earmark puts $17,000 drip pans on Army helicopter
Published: May 19, 2012

A powerful Kentucky congressman known for steering tens of millions of federal dollars to his district directed the Army to buy drip pans for its Black Hawk helicopters that cost $17,000 apiece, although a similar part is available for $2,500, The New York Times reported.



I'm sure that Phoenix Products in Kentucky appreciates the no-bid contract courtesy of Kentucky Rep. Harold Rogers, R-naturally.

May 13, 2012

The Quagmire Known As Afghanistan

As the slow-motion Tet of 2012 continues, more of our soldiers, sailors, marines and zoomies (no disrespect intended) continue to die, and our taxpayer dollars continue to be pissed away.

The Army Times today had a story:

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2012/05/ap-afghanistan-men-in-police-uniforms-kill-2-nato-service-members-051212/
Men in Afghan police garb kill 2 NATO troops
The Associated Press
Posted : Saturday May 12, 2012 14:06:21 EDT

KABUL, Afghanistan — Men wearing Afghan police uniforms shot dead two NATO service members Saturday in southern Afghanistan, authorities said, the latest in a string of attacks on international troops by Afghan security forces or militants disguised as police.


On May 1, 2012 the Army Times reported:

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2012/04/ap-isaf-under-reporting-attacks-afghan-allies-043012/
ISAF under-reporting attacks by Afghan allies

By Robert Burns - The Associated Press
Posted : Monday Apr 30, 2012 16:07:20 EDT

WASHINGTON — The military is under-reporting the number of times that Afghan soldiers and police open fire on American and other foreign troops.


I could go on and on, but this Toronto Sun op-ed says it all; read it and weep: http://www.torontosun.com/2012/05/04/obamas-disastrous-war



Afghan soldiers are directly responsible for almost 20% of American deaths since the beginning of 2012.

The US has had to abandon an $80 million dollar embassy in the northwest part of the country because the State department said it was not 'safe'.

The Pakistan supply routes into Afghanistan are still closed which means withdrawal will be around 5 times (500%) more expensive than shipping 'stuff' through Karachi.

The Marjah province, which the Pentagon proudly declared two years ago as 'pacified' appears to be un-pacified again.

Karzai's pissed at Obama for continuing to rain death on Afghan civilians: http://www.navytimes.com/news/2012/05/ap-karzai-airstrikes-could-undermine-us-pact-afghanistan-050812/

A general with the 82nd Airborne Division was relieved of command in Afghanistan and was sent back stateside: http://www.stripes.com/news/army/army-general-removed-from-job-in-afghanistan-1.177036

Then there's this little gem:

http://www.dailypress.com/news/military/dp-nws-joint-staff-college-muslims-20120512,0,1921294.story
Military college course advocated total war on Islam
By Hugh Lessig, hlessig@dailypress.com | 757-247-7821
May 12, 2012

A military college course taught in Norfolk suggested all-out war against Islam that could include threatening Saudi Arabia with starvation and the nuclear annihilation of the Islamic holy cities of Mecca and Medina.

The course, suspended last month at the Joint Forces Staff College, came into sharper focus this week when class materials were posted online by the Danger Room blog on wired.com.

Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey condemned the material at a Pentagon press conference Thursday and promised an investigation. The staff college is considered a select institution that trains senior military and civilian leaders for higher-level assignments throughout the U.S. military.

"It was just totally objectionable, against our values and it wasn't academically sound," he said. The student who tipped off military leaders about the course was "absolutely right," he added.



The question I ask myself is: Are there any adults around?

The United States has fucked up pretty much everything in Afghanistan. The Afghan people hate us; Pakistanis hate us; our coalition partners are pulling out earlier than planned, the cost of getting military supplies to Afghanistan has gone through the roof since the Pakistan border was closed, the State Department is afraid to open already built embassies because of 'safety' reasons and the United States is now 'pivoting to the Pacific'. And more Americans continue to die.


I won't even start talking (in this thread) about the shit-toys that are now being delivered to the Pentagon: National Security Cutters delivered with holes in the hull, LCSs back in the shop for cracks in the hulls, the F-22 fiasco (keep in mind the first prototype of this bird flew in 1994) and of course the F-35 woes built by the same guys that built the F-22. Ronnie Raygun's 'Missile Defense Shield' is kinda implemented and kinda somewhat works.

When dubya took over the White house in 2001, the military budget was $302 billion dollars; right now it's at one trillion dollars ($1,000,000,000,000 <- that's a one followed by twelve zeros). The Pentagon is pissing and moaning about sequestration ( which basically means they will lose 10% -that's right, ten fucking percent) of their annual budget.

And yet Obama wants to 'stay the course'.

May 6, 2012

Remember!

As Tet of 2012 comes to a painful end this year in Afghanistan, we should remember what my generation suffered almost 45 years ago.












How many more of these memorials must we build? How many more human beings must we kill?

May 5, 2012

If you're not doing anything Sunday evening, I suggest you watch 60 Minutes. (xpost from Veterans)

(This will be my first time in years and years and years.)

In November 2010 a pilot flying an F-22 in Alaska lost consciousness ('situational awareness ' in military-speak) and augured that almost half a billion dollar jet and himself into the ground.

The entire fleet of 186 F-22s were grounded for at least five months in 2011. Yup, all $77+ billion of these wondertoys were grounded because the oxygen system would cause pilots to 'experience hypoxia-like symptoms in flight', aka blackout. It's really bad form to blackout while you're flying a jet

Apparently there's been rumbles among the F-22 pilot community about the safety of flying these top-of-the-line $418 million front-line fifth-generation stealth fighters. I've been watching the military rags daily and in the last few months I've seen a number of articles about the search to find the root cause of the problem. The military, Lockheed Martin and Boeing (amongst others) have been trying to find out why the oxygen system in the F-22 fails for over a year with no luck to date. Nada. None. Zip.

At least Lockheed Martin is consistent in producing expensive crap that kills people. The only difference this time is they are killing the people who use these things.

Which leads me back to the subject of this thread.

F-22 Pilots to Discuss Why They Won’t Fly the Jet
http://defensetech.org/2012/05/04/f-22-pilots-to-discuss-why-they-wont-fly-the-jet/?comp=1198882887570&rank=4




So there’s been a bunch of commotion this week because two F-22 Raptor pilots say they want to transfer to flying different jets. Now, the pilots will go on 60 Minutes this Sunday to discuss the matter. Naturally, everyone’s freaking out since the pilots are apparently going to blow the lid off the jets’ safety issues that we, and everyone else, have written about over the last year.



unhappycamper comment: The $418 million dollar price tag on these bad boys came from a Time magazine article last summer.