polly7
polly7's JournalGreek referendum: euro crisis explodes into dramatic climax
By Jérôme Roos
Source: Roarmag.org
The announcement struck like a bombshell.
Now, with depositors lining up at ATMs to withdraw cash, the Eurogroup refusing to extend the current bailout program, the ECB capping its emergency liquidity assistance for Greek banks, and Greece set to miss a 1.5 billion IMF payment on Tuesday, the long-awaited endgame is finally upon us. After five long and exhausting years, the euro crisis has exploded into its dramatic climax.
Those who now lambast the Greek government for its supposed recklessness in calling the referendum are profoundly mistaken. Yes, as I have argued many times before, Tsipras and Varoufakis belief that they could somehow extract an honorable compromise from the creditors was always extremely naive. But in the end it was the creditors utter contempt for democracy that pushed Tsipras with his back against the wall, forcing him to sign up to an agreement that they knew would split his ruling party and government.
Deliberately tabling one outrageous proposal after another, the creditors intention was clear from the very start: they were never even remotely interested in any positive deal; the only thing they would settle for was Syrizas complete and total surrender ideally followed by technocratic regime change inside Greece. Paul Krugman was therefore entirely right when he referred to the creditors ultimatum as an act of monstrous folly.
Full article: https://zcomm.org/zcommentary/greek-referendum-euro-crisis-explodes-into-dramatic-climax/
Get your war reparations from Germany, Greece!
Outrageous Attempt at Killing the Deal with Iran
by Jan Oberg / June 25th, 2015
Here is the latest attempt at killing a deal with Iran that, to the sensitive reader with a minimum of knowledge of foreign policy and of the Iranian civilization, is little but one long argument for warfare on Iran in nobodys interest certainly also not in the interest of the citizens of Israel.
Is it just because it is summer time that intellectuals, media commentators and diplomats as well as friends and allies of the US conveniently have generally kept silent at irresponsible statements like this and the many before it?
Dont they understand that the nuclear issue as such not proliferation but possession is humanitys most important and that Iran has been the object of revengeful harassment since 1953 and punished for years for not having nuclear weapons?
A small group of extremist pro-Israeli Iran-haters in the United States have no right to expose the Middle East, Europe and the world to such a risk in the name of an outdated militarist national security thinking.
Full article: http://dissidentvoice.org/2015/06/outrageous-attempt-at-killing-the-deal-with-iran/
Iran has the same right to nuclear energy, medicine etc. that every other nation in the world has. It sits on loads of oil, but lacks the refineries to process it and thus does not have the required energy for its population - exactly the same circumstances as here in Canada. Iran has signed on to the NPT long ago and called for a nuclear-free ME. But .... the west needs and wants war. I wish every warmonger would head over to personally fight ISIS and leave peaceful nations alone, but ........ PNAC! 7 countries in 5 years! They make me sick.
The settlers considered the Native Americans extremely belligerent.
After all, they were on 'their' land and had to be removed, those that didn't agree were killed and often tortured in horrible ways. Defense of their land and settlements was met with extreme measures - don't you agree? But they were definitely considered the bad guys (terrorists), just as the Palestinians objecting to their confinement, loss of land, homes, livelihoods, lives are and have been for so many years.
'Terrorists' wasn't a handy word back then, but absolutely it would have been applied exactly the same way.
Real 'Terrorism' - deliberately attacking civilians and civilian targets in the world's largest open-air prison and all the other goodies they've been subjected to that cause fear and utter hopelessness - just as for any other targeted people in the world.
That is WHY. It's not fucking rocket science.
Dutch citizens just sued their government over inaction on climate change ... and they won.
Cheers and cries of pure joy erupted as the judge handed down the ruling in the world's first ever climate liability suit.
886 Dutch citizens, including teachers, entrepreneurs, grandparents and students united to sue their government for its inaction on climate change. In a decision likely to reverberate across the world, the court ordered the state to reduce emissions by 25% within 5 years to protect its citizens from climate change.
A HUGE congratulations to all involved, including Urgenda, the group that brought the suit on behalf of the citizens.
[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
Published on
Wednesday, June 24, 2015
byCommon Dreams
In Historic Ruling, Dutch Court Says: Climate Action is a Human Right
Hague District Court says Dutch government has a legal duty to reduce carbon emissions by 25 percent by 2020
by Lauren McCauley, staff writer
?itok=lAPeHo5e
Urgenda Foundation supporters celebrate at the Hague District Court after a historic ruling ordered the Dutch government to slash emissions. (Photo: Chantal Bekker/Urgenda)
The decision came in response to a lawsuit, launched in November 2013 by the Amsterdam-based environmental nonprofit Urgenda Foundation along with 600 Dutch citizens, which argued that the government was violating international human rights law by failing to take sufficient measures to combat rising greenhouse gas emissions.
"The state must do more to avert the imminent danger caused by climate change, also in view of its duty of care to protect and improve the living environment," read a statement from the Hague District Court.
Full article: http://www.commondreams.org/news/2015/06/24/historic-ruling-dutch-court-says-climate-action-human-right
Stop the privatization of Lagos' water
Corporate Accountability InternationalJune 25, 2015
(no link, an email)
As you read this, millions of people in Lagos, Nigeria are faced with the daily task of figuring out how to get safe water. And we're not talking about a few low-income neighborhoods here. A whopping 90 percent of Lagos' 21 million residents dont have daily access to safe water. Why? One big reason is that for years the World Bank has promoted the privatization of their city's water systems, strong-arming public officials and preventing the development of adequate public systems. It's outrageous.
And the people of Lagos have had enough. Our allies in Nigeria at Environmental Rights Action are leading a powerful movement to challenge corporate water privatizers and demand the human right to water. And we've got their backs. Just weeks from now, water justice activists from around the world are joining our friends in Lagos to set a roadmap that will protect the human right to water not just in Africa's largest city but around the world.
Millions in Lagos rely on costly or unsafe water sources such as poorly regulated wells, partly because the World Bank has pushed for a corporatized water system and prevented truly democratic public solutions from thriving for decades. For many, water arrives not through pipes to their homes, but through shared standpipes, or in jerry cans or cellophane bags. They're often forced to get their water from unknown sources at a markup charged by the few people who have access.
Recently, intense pressure from members like you and the people of Lagos forced the World Bank to back off yet another move toward privatization of the city's water. And this mighty grassroots movement in Lagos -- and around the world -- is making sure the new governor of Lagos commits to public water systems. The momentum is on our side, but we can't let up now.
Nigerian trade unionists push to stop water privatization
?itok=hqify9-a
In Nigeria, tens of thousands of people are standing together to protect their water from global corporations. With one voice, they have taken up a call: Our Water, Our Right. They have issued a powerful demand for the Lagos government to reject privatization plans.
Lagosians like Akinbode Oluwafemi, Director of ERA, are rejecting the privatization plans that the World Bank has spent decades paving the way for, because they know the disastrous results of other World Bank-backed projects: Rates are hiked, workers are laid off, and families find it harder than ever to access clean, safe water.
The Nigerian unions said, It is well past time that we got serious about resolving these problems. Access to clean and safe water and sanitation services is the minimum that we demand of our government. Is this really too much to ask? Is it even credible that, in the 21st century, we cant ensure universal access to water and sanitation?
That is why the stakes are so high. The World Bank and the global corporations it supports want Lagos to set the precedent for who controls water in Africa. The privatization of Lagos' water will put millions more lives at risk across the continent and we cannot let that happen.
PSI stands with the people in Lagos to defend their human right to water and sanitation, challenges the government to stand up to corporate water privatizers and supports Lagosians in their fight to keep their water in their own hands
http://www.world-psi.org/en/nigerian-trade-unionists-push-stop-water-privatization
Water Privatisation: A Worldwide Failure?
20150220 John Vidal The Guardian
But the companies, banks and donors all left, unable to agree with the federal or local authorities how to satisfy corporate demands, raise the billions of pounds inevitably needed, and convince the Nigerian public that international companies would fulfil their contracts and not make unreasonable profits from the sale of what was widely seen as a public resource.
The latest organisation to have failed to negotiate a Lagos water agreement is the IFC again. The private arm of the World Bank, which has lent more than $75 billion for water and sanitation projects around the world since 1995, has been in secret talks for more than a year with the citys private water company about funding another possible private-public partnership (PPP) scheme. But this week it categorically stated that negotiations had broken down and were unlikely to resume for years
The rebuff is a blow to the IFC, which has long been the worlds largest funder of global water projects, providing advice for governments and loans for companies to take over and invest in under-resourced water and sanitation systems in developing countries, often as part of a broader set of privatisation policies. According to the IFCs data, it completed 847 water projects between 1993 and 2013, nearly half of which were in Latin America.
Full article: http://ourworld.unu.edu/en/water-privatisation-a-worldwide-failure
Univision drops Miss USA pageant over Donald Trump's 'insulting remarks' about Latino immigrants
Trump accused Mexicans of bringing drugs, crime and rapists to the U.S. during campaign speechCBC News Posted: Jun 25, 2015 12:20 PM ET Last Updated: Jun 25, 2015 12:20 PM ET
http://i.cbc.ca/1.3127514.1435247704!/cpImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_620/miss-usa-2013.jpg
FILE - In this June 16, 2013 file photo, Donald Trump, left, and Miss Connecticut USA Erin Brady pose onstage after Brady won the 2013 Miss USA pageant in Las Vegas, Nev. Univision says it is dropping the Miss USA Pageant and says it will cut all business ties with Donald Trump over comments he made about Mexican immigrants. The network said Thursday, June 25, 2015, it will not air the pageant on July 12, as previously scheduled, and has ended its business relationship with the Miss Universe Organization due to what it called "insulting remarks about Mexican immigrants" by Trump, a part owner. (Jeff Bottari/AP File)
Univision is dropping the Miss USA pageant and says it will cut all business ties with Donald Trump over comments he made about Mexican immigrants.
The network said Thursday it will not air the July pageant and has ended its business relationship with the Miss Universe Organization, which produces the Miss USA pageant, due to what it called "insulting remarks about Mexican immigrants" by Trump, a part owner of Miss Universe.
Trump says he was only criticizing U.S. policies concerning Mexico, not its people. He says Univision is in default of a five-year contract.
Miss USA presenter pulled out
Univision's decision is the latest in the fallout over Trump's remarks: On Thursday, Puerto Rican actress and Miss USA presenter Roselyn Sanchez severed her ties with the pageant. And on Wednesday, Colombian singer J Balvin cancelled a planned performance.
Full article: http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/univision-drops-miss-usa-pageant-over-donald-trump-s-insulting-remarks-about-latino-immigrants-1.3127510
What election rules? U.S.-style attack time comes to Canada
Anonymous donors, no accountability, all fair in the PAC-land of pre-writ electioneeringBy Chris Hall, CBC News Posted: Jun 25, 2015 5:00 AM ET Last Updated: Jun 25, 2015 10:39 AM ET
VIDEO
But a growing number of third parties are exploiting a loophole in the law that puts no serious restrictions on how much is raised or spent before the campaign officially begins.
Engage Canada was started by two former senior Liberal staffers in Ontario, Don Guy and Dave Gene, and Kathleen Monk, an equally prominent federal NDP strategist. Take my word for it, because you won't find any disclosure of who is behind the group from its website.
On the other side is HarperPAC. The name tells you all you need to know.
The group is a "political action committee" in the U.S. mould and dedicated to re-electing the Harper government.
Full article: http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/what-election-rules-u-s-style-attack-time-comes-to-canada-1.3126670
Richard Sharp: (comment)
Harper has overwheming corporate support, including the corporate media. Not only do they run the attack ads, 49 of the top 50 English newspapers supported Harper in 2011. The Star endorsed Layton.
Harper has also spent a billion or more in government advertising patting himself on the back. So, it's hardly a level playing field.
harper has exploited every loophole in the system after promising better. "you won't recognize Canada when i'm through with it." was more like a threat.
‘The American Century’ Has Plunged the World Into Crisis
By Conn Hallinan and Leon Wofsy
Source: Foreign Policy in Focus
June 23, 2015
While this illusion goes back to the end of World War II, it was the end of the Cold War and collapse of the Soviet Union that signaled the beginning of a self-proclaimed American Century. The idea that the United States had won the Cold War and now as the worlds lone superpower had the right or responsibility to order the worlds affairs led to a series of military adventures. It started with President Bill Clintons intervention in the Yugoslav civil war, continued on with George W. Bushs disastrous invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, and can still be seen in the Obama administrations own misadventures in Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, and beyond.
In each case, Washington chose war as the answer to enormously complex issues, ignoring the profound consequences for both foreign and domestic policy. Yet the world is very different from the assumptions that drive this impulsive interventionism.
Its this disconnect that defines the current crisis.
Acknowledging New Realities:
Short Memories and Persistent Delusions:
Unexceptionalism:
The Home Front:
Bombs and Business:
.......
Full article: https://zcomm.org/znetarticle/the-american-century-has-plunged-the-world-into-crisis/
Disclaimer: Again, I freely acknowledge many others should also be included in these articles and titles ...... but seriously, we're destroying the world.
Public Didn’t See Last Two World Wars Coming Either
by David Swanson / June 20th, 2015
Perhaps they would have been attacked anyway. Iraq and Libya disarmed, in terms of so-called WMDs, and the U.S. attacked them.
Or perhaps they would have been left alone. Most nations that do not threaten their neighbors are not threatened in return.
In any case, there would have been no world wars killing tens of millions of people if there hadnt been willing partners on both sides. Any war there was would have been one-sided. Any nonviolent resistance would likewise have experienced one-sided suffering. But most of the death and destruction would not have happened.
The United States has pulled out of the anti-ballistic missile treaty and expanded NATO to a dozen new nations, moving right up to the border of Russia. Its placed troops and weapons on the Russian border. Its organized a coup in Ukraine and installed a Ukrainian government full of neo-Nazis. Its lied to its people about Russian invasions and Russian attacks on airplanes. Its fantasized about its missile-defense system allowing it to attack Russia, or China for that matter, without counter-attack. Its proposed to put more nukes in Europe aimed at Russia. Its built bases around the edges of China. Its trying to militarize Japan again. Its imposed sanctions on Russia. Its threatened, mocked, ridiculed, and demonized Russia and its president and North Korea for good measure. Informed observers warn of the heightened risk of nuclear Armageddon. And most people in the United States havent a clue.
Full article: http://dissidentvoice.org/2015/06/public-didnt-see-last-two-world-wars-coming-either/
I think the 'next' war already began with the invasion of Iraq, and every bomb dropped since has just been a continuation of it ... though those nations bombarded with drones and misery haven't actually had 'war' declared upon them. Strange, that. Just bombing by a foreign military - nothing to see here, move along .....
Weeding Roses in Kabul
by Martha Hennessy / June 20th, 2015
Speaking at Arizona State Universitys McCain Institute, Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter complained that the U.S. wouldnt be sidelined. We already see countries in the region trying to carve up these markets We must all decide if we are going to let that happen if were going to help boost our exports and our economy and cement our influence and leadership in the fastest growing region in the world; or if, instead, were going to take ourselves out of the game.
Full article: http://dissidentvoice.org/2015/06/weeding-roses-in-kabul/
These people stopped mattering to those with power a long, long time ago. Kudos to the APV and other organizations brave and compassionate enough to still try to help.
Profile Information
Gender: Do not displayHometown: Saskatchewan
Home country: Canada
Member since: Sat Jul 9, 2005, 11:46 PM
Number of posts: 20,582