NYC_SKP
Profile Information
Name: N/A
Gender: Do not display
Hometown: The Golden State
Home country: www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&f
Current location: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1243&pid=30906
Member since: Thu May 29, 2008, 11:43 PM
Number of posts: 68,644
Gender: Do not display
Hometown: The Golden State
Home country: www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&f
Current location: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1243&pid=30906
Member since: Thu May 29, 2008, 11:43 PM
Number of posts: 68,644
About Me
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12593371#post1 [div class=excerpt]http://www.democraticunderground.com/124384291 http://www.democraticunderground.com/124384554 1. It need not be unanimous. But there must be the consensus. I tend to think that if one person is strongly opposed to a lock, and is making that stand based on some principle they are able to articulate, then that position should be respected and consensus does not exist. But if some people are just-kinda-meh-not-sure opposed to a lock, then you can assume that consensus exists. But I think the bigger picture is that if everyone is doing the job in good faith and being polite to each other, then it should not be very hard to determine if consensus exists and act accordingly. http://www.democraticunderground.com/12595617 [/div] ~~~~~~ Hi Jerry!!! :thumbsup:[font color=blue][b][link:http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1269|Visit the new DU \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Progressive Media Resources Group\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"][/font size][/font color][/b]:thumbsup: http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/dam/assets/121223012937-11-obama-face-1223-horizontal-gallery.jpg :thumbsup:[font color = blue][b][link:http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1269|Visit the new DU \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Progressive Media Resources Group\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"][/font size][/font color][/b]:thumbsup: http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/dam/assets/121223012937-11-obama-face-1223-horizontal-gallery.jpg [b][link:http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1269|[font style=\\\"color:#0000ff !important;\\\"]:thumbsup: Visit the new DU Progressive Media Resources Group] http://i97.photobucket.com/albums/l217/Shockwave_73/warren_2016_bumper_sticker.jpg blue color is color:#0000ff
Journal Archives
"I know she's not perfect to me, but she's all I have." "I'm standing by her."
Posted by NYC_SKP | Wed May 13, 2015, 05:13 PM (2 replies)
It is a script, a script of fear, doubt, and uncertainty. They have nothing else, not a thing.
Reasons we must support Hillary and shut the fuck up about all her baggage:
"Nader" "SCOTUS" "Koch Brothers" Now, never mind that Clinton: -- is mostly funded by big banksters; -- takes Koch Brothers money; -- benefits from Citizens United; -- thinks that corporations are more trustworthy than governments These, to me, are huge red flags at a minimum, and should really disqualify her from consideration for running as the leader of our party. Hi, Nadin! 
|
Posted by NYC_SKP | Wed May 13, 2015, 01:31 PM (2 replies)
Hillary Clinton on the TPP. It's gonna help women and migrant workers.
Promises, promises...
"Better jobs with higher wages and safer working conditions, including for women, migrant workers and others too often in the past excluded from the formal economy" Cut in at the right moment here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=460&v=i7Iq8pyIT84 Full transcript here: http://www.state.gov/secretary/20092013clinton/rm/2012/11/200664.htm Later in the same clip, Secretary Clinton on privatization (doesn't like publicly run enterprises) And finally, the resurgence of state capitalism: a challenge at once economic and strategic. Now, state-owned or state-supported enterprises are not necessarily problematic in all cases. But they do often lack the transparency and accountability that come with private boards and investors. Supporters: Are you sure you know your candidate? 
|
Posted by NYC_SKP | Tue May 12, 2015, 01:33 PM (30 replies)
You said it, Aerows. The enemies that hurt us most are on Wall Street and other global centers.
Posted by NYC_SKP | Wed May 6, 2015, 05:49 PM (1 replies)
