Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
dogknob
dogknob's Journal
dogknob's Journal
April 13, 2022
Rideshare apps Uber and Lyft have been accused of severely increasing the prices for rides shortly following a mass shooting on the New York subway system that left at least 13 people injured and many more fleeing in terror. Screenshots from peoples phones showing fares as high as $145 to get away from the area of the shooting have been going around Twitter as people express outrage over the grimmest bit of price gouging seen since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.
@Uber turn off surges in sunset park, wrote one local woman. People are scared, let them get out safely.
Both Uber and Lyft use an automatic system that detects areas of high demand and implements surge pricing, increasing the prices of their services based on how many people in the area are requesting them. You can see how this could at times create horrifying dystopian nightmare situations, and yet both companies continue to rely on it.
Uber And Lyft Jacked Up Prices As People Fled The New York Subway Shooting
Rideshare apps Uber and Lyft have been accused of severely increasing the prices for rides shortly following a mass shooting on the New York subway system that left at least 13 people injured and many more fleeing in terror. Screenshots from peoples phones showing fares as high as $145 to get away from the area of the shooting have been going around Twitter as people express outrage over the grimmest bit of price gouging seen since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.
@Uber turn off surges in sunset park, wrote one local woman. People are scared, let them get out safely.
Both Uber and Lyft use an automatic system that detects areas of high demand and implements surge pricing, increasing the prices of their services based on how many people in the area are requesting them. You can see how this could at times create horrifying dystopian nightmare situations, and yet both companies continue to rely on it.
April 12, 2022
San Diegos largest high school caused a stir with its latest effort to address education equity, and its approach certainly prompts more than a few questions.
On Sunday the U-Ts Kristen Taketa reported that Patrick Henry High in San Carlos, a school that teaches 2,500 students, removed several honors, advanced and gifted education courses without informing parents or seeking their input. Some of the courses included classes for advanced English, advanced history and advanced biology.
*snip*
From the jump, the school could not have communicated this change more poorly. Even if you werent interested in incorporating feedback from parents, the school owed all its families the courtesy of transparent communication about what was occurring.
Instead it seems that the school chose to keep parents in the dark, and in turn parents are understandably confused, angry and concerned about what the implications will be for their children.
Putting that aside, the idea of trying to mix classes to lift all students has merit. Although, its fair to wonder if this is really the best approach the school could apply.
I graduated from Henry in 1988 and I am still in touch with many friends from that time. Many of them have kids currently attending Henry and they are PISSED OFF. They all hate the principal anyway, whose on-campus visibility is on-par with the Once-Ler's. Many suspect she is trying to cut operating coststeachers who teach advanced classes get paid more and using "equity" as a smoke-screen.
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/columnists/story/2022-04-12/column-patrick-henry-high-schools-honors-courses-controversy-fails-to-address-issue-of-access
Patrick Henry High School's honors courses controversy fails to address issue of access
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/columnists/story/2022-04-12/column-patrick-henry-high-schools-honors-courses-controversy-fails-to-address-issue-of-accessSan Diegos largest high school caused a stir with its latest effort to address education equity, and its approach certainly prompts more than a few questions.
On Sunday the U-Ts Kristen Taketa reported that Patrick Henry High in San Carlos, a school that teaches 2,500 students, removed several honors, advanced and gifted education courses without informing parents or seeking their input. Some of the courses included classes for advanced English, advanced history and advanced biology.
*snip*
From the jump, the school could not have communicated this change more poorly. Even if you werent interested in incorporating feedback from parents, the school owed all its families the courtesy of transparent communication about what was occurring.
Instead it seems that the school chose to keep parents in the dark, and in turn parents are understandably confused, angry and concerned about what the implications will be for their children.
Putting that aside, the idea of trying to mix classes to lift all students has merit. Although, its fair to wonder if this is really the best approach the school could apply.
I graduated from Henry in 1988 and I am still in touch with many friends from that time. Many of them have kids currently attending Henry and they are PISSED OFF. They all hate the principal anyway, whose on-campus visibility is on-par with the Once-Ler's. Many suspect she is trying to cut operating coststeachers who teach advanced classes get paid more and using "equity" as a smoke-screen.
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/columnists/story/2022-04-12/column-patrick-henry-high-schools-honors-courses-controversy-fails-to-address-issue-of-access
Profile Information
Member since: Tue Jun 16, 2009, 04:09 PMNumber of posts: 2,431