Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
SunSeeker
SunSeeker's Journal
SunSeeker's Journal
January 23, 2016
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/01/23/us/their-boss-stays-on-the-sideline-but-obama-aides-tilt-to-clinton.html?_r=0
Their Boss Stays on the Sideline, but Obama Aides Tilt to Clinton
The two leading Democratic contenders for president are competing to wrap President Obama in a tight embrace. He is hugging only one of them back.
With Hillary Clinton and Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont locked in an increasingly taut battle in the final days before the Iowa caucuses, both are laying claim to Mr. Obamas mantle, and to the young voters he turned out in 2008 and 2012. Mr. Sanders is selling himself as an insurgent in the spirit of Mr. Obama; Mrs. Clinton as the custodian of his legacy.
So far, legacy is winning out.
With Hillary Clinton and Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont locked in an increasingly taut battle in the final days before the Iowa caucuses, both are laying claim to Mr. Obamas mantle, and to the young voters he turned out in 2008 and 2012. Mr. Sanders is selling himself as an insurgent in the spirit of Mr. Obama; Mrs. Clinton as the custodian of his legacy.
So far, legacy is winning out.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/01/23/us/their-boss-stays-on-the-sideline-but-obama-aides-tilt-to-clinton.html?_r=0
January 22, 2016
http://m.dailykos.com/stories/1472714
Sanders camp confirms it thinks Planned Parenthood is part of the establishment out to beat Bernie
...in an interview with MSNBCs Chuck Todd Wednesday afternoon, Sanders top strategist, Tad Devine, confirmed that the campaign does indeed view Planned Parenthood as part of a Democratic establishment thats actively opposing Sanders:
Todd: Do you believe that Planned Parenthood and Human Rights Campaignthat these are part of the Democratic establishment that's trying to defeat you?
Devine: I do, Chuck. I think the leadership of Washington-based groupsand it's not just those twoare part of a political establishment here in Washington.
Devines statement, in response to a direct question from Todd, is unambiguous. To many progressives who have witnessed Planned Parenthood endure the most witheringly malicious and mendacious assault from conservatives for the past several years, its distressing to see the Sanders campaign view it as an organization its taking on, simply because it endorsed Hillary Clinton.
Todd: Do you believe that Planned Parenthood and Human Rights Campaignthat these are part of the Democratic establishment that's trying to defeat you?
Devine: I do, Chuck. I think the leadership of Washington-based groupsand it's not just those twoare part of a political establishment here in Washington.
Devines statement, in response to a direct question from Todd, is unambiguous. To many progressives who have witnessed Planned Parenthood endure the most witheringly malicious and mendacious assault from conservatives for the past several years, its distressing to see the Sanders campaign view it as an organization its taking on, simply because it endorsed Hillary Clinton.
http://m.dailykos.com/stories/1472714
January 21, 2016
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/01/hillary_clinton_s_ties_to_black_democrats_will_save_her_campaign_from_bernie.html
Why Bernie Sanders Still Doesn’t Pose a Critical Threat to Hillary Clinton
The Vermont senator may be surging, but black Democrats are her firewall.
By Jamelle Bouie
... the rapid rise of Sandersand the pointed attacks from Clintonobscure the extent to which the overall state of the race hasnt changed. Clinton is still the favorite for the nomination, even as her path gets a little rockier and a little more difficult. And the reason isnt hard to understand.
Take the recent Monmouth University poll of the Democratic race. Between December and January, Clinton lost her lead with white Democrats. Indeed, it vanished, dropping 23 points. Now, shes tied with Sanders, 43 percent to 43 percent. But shes grown her lead with black and Latino Democrats, winning 71 percent to 21 percent for the Vermont senator, up from 61 percent in January.
This lead with black and Latino Democrats isnt just responsible for Clintons margin in national pollingwhere she outpaces Sanders by an average of 13 pointsits responsible for her massive lead in the South Carolina primary, where black voters predominate and where Clinton crushes Sanders with an average margin of 40 points (although theres been little polling in the state since the new year).
Which gets to a broader, more important point. Minority votersand black Americans in particularare the firewall for Clintons candidacy and the Democratic establishment writ large. As long as Clinton holds her lead with black Democrats, shes tough (if not impossible) to beat in delegate-rich states like New York, New Jersey, Illinois, Ohio, and Texas. Even with momentum from wins in Iowa and New Hampshire, its hard to see how Sanders overcomes Clintons massive advantage with this part of the partys electorate . Thats not to say he wont excel as an insurgent candidate, but thatbarring a seismic shift among black Democrats, as well as Latinoshis coalition wont overcome her coalition.
By Jamelle Bouie
... the rapid rise of Sandersand the pointed attacks from Clintonobscure the extent to which the overall state of the race hasnt changed. Clinton is still the favorite for the nomination, even as her path gets a little rockier and a little more difficult. And the reason isnt hard to understand.
Take the recent Monmouth University poll of the Democratic race. Between December and January, Clinton lost her lead with white Democrats. Indeed, it vanished, dropping 23 points. Now, shes tied with Sanders, 43 percent to 43 percent. But shes grown her lead with black and Latino Democrats, winning 71 percent to 21 percent for the Vermont senator, up from 61 percent in January.
This lead with black and Latino Democrats isnt just responsible for Clintons margin in national pollingwhere she outpaces Sanders by an average of 13 pointsits responsible for her massive lead in the South Carolina primary, where black voters predominate and where Clinton crushes Sanders with an average margin of 40 points (although theres been little polling in the state since the new year).
Which gets to a broader, more important point. Minority votersand black Americans in particularare the firewall for Clintons candidacy and the Democratic establishment writ large. As long as Clinton holds her lead with black Democrats, shes tough (if not impossible) to beat in delegate-rich states like New York, New Jersey, Illinois, Ohio, and Texas. Even with momentum from wins in Iowa and New Hampshire, its hard to see how Sanders overcomes Clintons massive advantage with this part of the partys electorate . Thats not to say he wont excel as an insurgent candidate, but thatbarring a seismic shift among black Democrats, as well as Latinoshis coalition wont overcome her coalition.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/01/hillary_clinton_s_ties_to_black_democrats_will_save_her_campaign_from_bernie.html
January 19, 2016
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/01/case-against-bernie-sanders.html#
Great read. The article demonstrates why Hillary is far and away the best candidate when it comes to being able to do what actually can get done.
New York Magazine: The Case Against Bernie Sanders
...
Sanders has promised to replace Obamacare with a single-payer plan, without having any remotely plausible prospects for doing so. Many advocates of single-payer imagine that only the power of insurance companies stands in their way, but the more imposing obstacles would be reassuring suspicious voters that the change in their insurance (from private to public) would not harm them and more difficult still raising the taxes to pay for it. As Sarah Kliff details, Vermont had to abandon hopes of creating its own single-payer plan. If Vermont, one of the most liberal states in America, cant summon the political willpower for single-payer, it is impossible to imagine the country as a whole doing it. Not surprisingly, Sanders's health-care plan uses the kind of magical-realism approach to fiscal policy usually found in Republican budgets, conjuring trillions of dollars in savings without definingtheir source.
...
The Sanders campaign represents a revolution of rising expectations. In 2008, the last time Democrats held a contested primary, the prospect of simply taking back the presidency from Republican control was nearly enough to motivate the partys vote. The potential to enact dramatic change was merely a bonus. After nearly two terms of power, with the prospect of Republican rule now merely hypothetical, Democrats want more.
The paradox is that the presidents ability to deliver more change is far more limited. The current occupant of the Oval Office and his successor will have a House of Representatives firmly under right-wing rule, making the prospects of important progressive legislation impossible. This hardly renders the presidency impotent, obviously. The end of Obamas term has shown that a creative president can still drive some change.
But here is a second irony: Those areas in which a Democratic Executive branch has no power are those in which Sanders demands aggressive action, and the areas in which the Executive branch still has power now are precisely those in which Sanders has the least to say. The president retains full command of foreign affairs; can use executive authority to drive social policy change in areas like criminal justice and gender; and can, at least in theory, staff the judiciary. What the next president wont accomplish is to increase taxes, expand social programs, or do anything to reduce inequality, given the House Republicans fanatically pro-inequality positions across the board. The next Democratic presidential term will be mostly defensive, a bulwark against the enactment of the radical Ryan plan. What little progress liberals can expect will be concentrated in the non-Sanders realm.
Sanders has promised to replace Obamacare with a single-payer plan, without having any remotely plausible prospects for doing so. Many advocates of single-payer imagine that only the power of insurance companies stands in their way, but the more imposing obstacles would be reassuring suspicious voters that the change in their insurance (from private to public) would not harm them and more difficult still raising the taxes to pay for it. As Sarah Kliff details, Vermont had to abandon hopes of creating its own single-payer plan. If Vermont, one of the most liberal states in America, cant summon the political willpower for single-payer, it is impossible to imagine the country as a whole doing it. Not surprisingly, Sanders's health-care plan uses the kind of magical-realism approach to fiscal policy usually found in Republican budgets, conjuring trillions of dollars in savings without definingtheir source.
...
The Sanders campaign represents a revolution of rising expectations. In 2008, the last time Democrats held a contested primary, the prospect of simply taking back the presidency from Republican control was nearly enough to motivate the partys vote. The potential to enact dramatic change was merely a bonus. After nearly two terms of power, with the prospect of Republican rule now merely hypothetical, Democrats want more.
The paradox is that the presidents ability to deliver more change is far more limited. The current occupant of the Oval Office and his successor will have a House of Representatives firmly under right-wing rule, making the prospects of important progressive legislation impossible. This hardly renders the presidency impotent, obviously. The end of Obamas term has shown that a creative president can still drive some change.
But here is a second irony: Those areas in which a Democratic Executive branch has no power are those in which Sanders demands aggressive action, and the areas in which the Executive branch still has power now are precisely those in which Sanders has the least to say. The president retains full command of foreign affairs; can use executive authority to drive social policy change in areas like criminal justice and gender; and can, at least in theory, staff the judiciary. What the next president wont accomplish is to increase taxes, expand social programs, or do anything to reduce inequality, given the House Republicans fanatically pro-inequality positions across the board. The next Democratic presidential term will be mostly defensive, a bulwark against the enactment of the radical Ryan plan. What little progress liberals can expect will be concentrated in the non-Sanders realm.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/01/case-against-bernie-sanders.html#
Great read. The article demonstrates why Hillary is far and away the best candidate when it comes to being able to do what actually can get done.
January 10, 2016
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/2016-state-of-the-union-obama-clinton-217541#ixzz3wsvTXwNG
The White House will campaign for Clinton, but not in the SOTU speech.
People inside the West Wing have a vision of President Barack Obamas 2016: hell take on the role that Bill Clinton played for him in 2012, the elder statesman and battering ram, laying out a fact- and figure-based case for why Democratic governing gets better results than Republican promises.
Thats coming, aides say. But not on Tuesday...He will talk about who we are as Americans and focus on some consistent themes of his presidencya country that adapts to challenges, that creates things, that believes that change and progress are possible, the aide said.
But theres a way that a speech like that helps Clinton, said Mo Elleithee, a spokesman for Clintons 2008 campaign whos now the executive director of Georgetown University's Institute of Politics and Public Service.
This is an important moment in defining his legacy. But it can also help her in two ways. By going out there and selling the past seven years, she doesnt have to. She can stay focused on the future, Elleithee said. And, he can begin making the case to general election voters while shes still in a primary. He can begin looking down the field before she has the luxury to, or before shes allowed to.
Thats coming, aides say. But not on Tuesday...He will talk about who we are as Americans and focus on some consistent themes of his presidencya country that adapts to challenges, that creates things, that believes that change and progress are possible, the aide said.
But theres a way that a speech like that helps Clinton, said Mo Elleithee, a spokesman for Clintons 2008 campaign whos now the executive director of Georgetown University's Institute of Politics and Public Service.
This is an important moment in defining his legacy. But it can also help her in two ways. By going out there and selling the past seven years, she doesnt have to. She can stay focused on the future, Elleithee said. And, he can begin making the case to general election voters while shes still in a primary. He can begin looking down the field before she has the luxury to, or before shes allowed to.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/2016-state-of-the-union-obama-clinton-217541#ixzz3wsvTXwNG
Profile Information
Gender: Do not displayHome country: USA
Current location: Southern California
Member since: Sun Mar 20, 2011, 12:05 PM
Number of posts: 51,550