YoungDemCA
YoungDemCA's JournalRe: "racism divides working people from each other"...
...I believe it is critical for us to remind the white liberals and leftists - who are basically the only people who perpetuate this meme - that the division only goes one way. It's not working people of color who have consistently sided with the wealthiest Americans against the interests of both people of color as well as the common people more broadly.
The racial divide within the working class is entirely the result of white racism and efforts to uphold white supremacy. Workers of color have always been pushing for their inclusion within the Anerican labor movement and other movements of working people. And white workers have quite consistently and deliberately excluded workers of color from participation in working class political movements. So much for working class "solidarity".
The almost exclusively white voices who lambast how the wealthy classes "divide us against one another" and "distract us from pushing for economic justice" have no business calling for working class unity against the "1%" when it is their community - the white community - who have been entirely responsible for the race-based divides and interracial tensions within the Anerican working class.
My message to these white liberals: Make sure that your own house is in order before you go around criticizing others for supposedly sowing "division" among liberal-minded people.
British voters who oppose immigration, multiculturalism, social liberalism, etc. were pro-Brexit
And by overwhelming margins, for that matter.
On either side, 51% of voters thought capitalism was a force for ill, while 49% thought it was a force for good.
But sure, the results of this referendum were about "neoliberal tyranny."
Report: ‘Racial Rules’ Widen Economic Inequality for African Americans
Great article.
The Washington-based Roosevelt Institute, a nonprofit economic think tank, recently released the study, Rewrite the Racial Rules: Building an Inclusive American Economy, that explains how the countrys racial history affects the national economic landscape that African Americans must navigate. A series of racial rules has really set the foundation for the racial and economic inequality, explains Andrea Flynn, an Institute fellow who co-authored the study.
Yet American workplaces remain highly segregated. After 1980, many employment sectors lost ground on diversity: Between 2001 and 2005, nearly one-third of all industries, including transportation services and banking showed a trend toward resegregation among white men and black men.
The report concludes that race-neutral rules wont work since slavery and Jim Crow produced discriminatory attitudes and practices that have been difficult to eradicate and still pervade American society today, noting that The enduring legacy of black slavery is built into our current institutions, policies, programs, and practices and has multigenerational impacts on the life chances and outcomes of black Americans.
The report suggests that in order to create a more inclusive economy, the U.S. still must rely on racially explicit affirmative action policies and anti-discrimination mandates. African Americans saw modest gains in employment and education after race-specific policies like affirmative action policies were implemented.
http://prospect.org/article/report-%E2%80%98racial-rules%E2%80%99-widen-economic-inequality-african-americans
Not In My Gay Bar (HuffPo)
Powerful and poignant guest article in the Huffington Post by Joshua Manning. A few excerpts:
snip:
Which is why, for many LGBT people - myself included - gay bars are on that very small list of transformative places. The moment you walk in, none of those worries are relevant. You are not going to be punched or harassed. You already came out to everyone just by walking in the door - no conversational juggling needed. You dont need to read into every interaction because the space exists to equalize all the reasons you would do that. That is true whether you like the bar or not - from the seediest dive to the clubbiest club. In there you can connect differently when, for a few hours, youre in a safe place where it feels like the world is made for you. Some of this connection lingers in the outside world - its why youll often hear LGBT people call each other family even when we dont know each other.
snip:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sara-manning-peskin/not-in-my-gay-bar-asking-_b_10559922.html
In spite of the very real progress that the LGBTQ community has made in recent decades through gruelingly hard work, agiation, organizing, and unimaginable pain and suffering, our society still has a long way to go in securing liberty and equality for the LGBTQ community - and other socially marginalized and persecuted groups, for that matter.
Let us never be complacent.
Oakland’s Prosperity Movement fights gentrification by supporting local culture
These new economies are being developed, but the African American population and the Latino population and immigrant population are all being locked out of this new economy, and people are coming in because they see that they can make money off of Oakland. So theres a whole other population that says, We can make money in Oakland, we can suck Oakland dry, we can pimp Oakland. They say, We can make money off that hoe called Oakland, which makes it very different from someone who says, I love Oakland! Man, I want to go in there and start a business, said Madyun.[/div
http://sfbayview.com/2016/06/oaklands-prosperity-movement-fights-gentrification-by-supporting-local-culture/
A reminder of who actually supports - and has supported all along - Donald Trump's campaign
The White Nationalists Who Support Donald Trumphttp://abcnews.go.com/Politics/white-nationalists-support-donald-trump/story?id=37524610
Top Racists And Neo-Nazis Back Donald Trump
https://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/meet-the-prominent-white-nationalists-fired-up-to-support-do?utm_term=.bnDXXBEPk#.qyLKKmb0D
I Criticized Donald Trump, And Was Attacked Online By Neo-Nazis
http://opinion.injo.com/2015/09/247688-criticized-donald-trump-attacked-online-neo-nazis/
I have noticed in recent years just how openly and blatantly racist a lot of (white) people have become (or at the very least, they have become far more vocal about it). I routinely hear horrifying things about minorities, women, and immigrants - even from people who are (or rather, I had thought were) pretty liberal. Pretty scary.
Racism and bigotry in general never went away, it just hid in the shadows, lurking like a predator that was waiting for the right opportunity to strike again. And the candidacy of Trump has been a golden opportunity, a galvanizing force for anyone who has a bigoted bone in their body and isn't or doesn't want to be ashamed by it. Consider the fact that the Republican nominee - the nominee of one of the two major parties - is enthusiastically supported by Neo-Nazis and other white supremacists. Those people never support the Republican nominee, let alone as openly and unashamedly as they have been supporting Trump!
The Neo-Nazis and other white natinoalist/supremacist/identity movements have officially gone mainstream. Holy. Fucking. Shit.
How Bernie Sanders Exposed the Democrats’ Racial Rift
Excellent Politico article.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/06/2016-bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-democrats-race-racial-divide-213948#ixzz4BlPY6r17
Not only can the US Constitution be amended, but existing amendments can be reinterpreted
Both of these things have happened repeatedly throughout American history.
Also, take a look at the first clause of Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution:
There it is, in black and white (pun intended). The institution of slavery is enshrined in the US Constitution. We just disregard that part of the Constitution, because we eventually recognized that our moral code is not (and should not be) dictated by a piece of paper that itself was an imperfect and incomplete compromise between a wide array of wealthy, powerful interests in the era of the early Republic.
Apparently though, for some strange and mysterious reason, the Second Amendment is completely off-limits. The normal process of contextualization, compromise, and regulation does not apply here. Intriguing...
This just about sums up the gun "debate" in the US
"If the murder of 30 schoolchildren and their teachers didn't result in stricter gun regulation then neither will the murder of 50 LGBT Americans."
We have done this song and dance so many times that I lost count several mass shootings ago. The gun nuts won. There will be nothing other than meaningless (and frankly, insulting) "thoughts and prayers" from the same people who will never support any increase in gun regulation. In fact, it is far more likely that there will be less regulation of firearms in the future, especially if Trump is elected and the Republican Party continues to control Congress and the Supreme Court.
The United States of America, the self-described Leader of the Free World, can't even protect its own people from being murdered in cold blood by nuts with guns - all in the name of "freedom." The freedom of gun owners to buy their precious toys and for gun manufacturers to make them and for gun stores to sell them. Naturally, this all comes at the cost of the freedom to not live in fear every time you go out in public that some deranged asshole might shoot you. The former freedom exists at the expense of the latter one. That is the choice we have collectively made as a society. Gun rights are more important than human safety.
Pretty fucking sad.
On Saudi Arabia's central role in sponsoring terrorism and the ideology that underpins it
The most fundamentally important thing to understand about Saudi Arabia's role in aiding, abetting, and assisting Al-Qaeda and its various offshoots is that the House of Saud's legitimacy as the ruling family of their country is based entirely on their alliance with the Wahhabist religious establishment that controls Saudi society. The Wahhabis support the al-Saud's rule in exchange for the latter's protection of the Land of the Two Mosques. This alliance has been solidified by intermarriage between the two ruling establishment of Saudi Arabia over the three centuries of the alliance's existence. In sum, the alliance between the al-Saud's and the Wahhabis is an integration of the ruling political and religious classes in the Kingdom - classes who support each other in a mutually beneficial agreement.
However, there is a fundamental tension between the fanatically puritanical and austere Wahhabis on the one hand and the decidedly lavish, Westernized lifestyles of the al-Sauds on the other. In a society that is absolutely dominated by Wahhabist extremist ideology, the vast majority of criticism of and dissent against the ruling family is rooted in the argument that the al-Sauds are total hypocrites who preach Wahhabism yet practice "corrupt", decadent, and Westernized lifestyles. In other words, the House of Saud is accused by its internal critics of not being Wahhabist enough.
The implication of this tension is that the al-Saud has adopted a strategy of brutally crushing (most) domestic dissent (except from the Wahhabist religious establishment, whom as previously mentioned, the ruling family depends on for support and legitimacy) while generously funding and exporting Wahhabist ideology to the rest of the world. In essence, the House of Saud exports both its ideology and many of its most extreme critics to both Islamic and non-Islamic countries around the globe.
Consequently, al-Qaeda and allied organizations are heavily funded by wealthy Saudi donors who, for the most part, operate freely within the Kingdom. All of this is why Saudi Arabia has been, at best, an unreliable and deeply problematic "ally" in America's global battle against al-Qaeda and its allies. Unfortunately, should the House of Saud fall, there will be no remotely "liberal" or Westernized democracy to take its place. This is a society that is deeply steeped in regressive cultural traditions and extreme religious ideology. And as much as I absolutely loathe the House of Saud and its brutal and barbaric oppression of its own people, I honestly do not see there being a better alternative; just a lot of scarier and more dangerous ones.
Really a fucked up situation all around.
Profile Information
Gender: MaleHometown: CA
Home country: USA
Member since: Wed Jan 18, 2012, 11:29 PM
Number of posts: 5,714