Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ucrdem

ucrdem's Journal
ucrdem's Journal
May 23, 2013

Obama calls on Congress to allow transfer of GITMO detainees

Source: TPM

From text of today's Counterterrorism speech:

Today, I once again call on Congress to lift the restrictions on detainee transfers from GTMO. I have asked the Department of Defense to designate a site in the United States where we can hold military commissions. I am appointing a new, senior envoy at the State Department and Defense Department whose sole responsibility will be to achieve the transfer of detainees to third countries.

I am lifting the moratorium on detainee transfers to Yemen, so we can review them on a case by case basis. To the greatest extent possible, we will transfer detainees who have been cleared to go to other countries. Where appropriate, we will bring terrorists to justice in our courts and military justice system. And we will insist that judicial review be available for every detainee.

Even after we take these steps, one issue will remain: how to deal with those GTMO detainees who we know have participated in dangerous plots or attacks, but who cannot be prosecuted – for example because the evidence against them has been compromised or is inadmissible in a court of law. But once we commit to a process of closing GTMO, I am confident that this legacy problem can be resolved, consistent with our commitment to the rule of law.

I know the politics are hard. But history will cast a harsh judgment on this aspect of our fight against terrorism, and those of us who fail to end it. Imagine a future – ten years from now, or twenty years from now – when the United States of America is still holding people who have been charged with no crime on a piece of land that is not a part of our country. Look at the current situation, where we are force-feeding detainees who are holding a hunger strike. Is that who we are? Is that something that our Founders foresaw? Is that the America we want to leave to our children?

Read more: http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/read-transcript-of-obamas-speech-on-counterterrorism-policy



"legacy problem" -- Sounds like he means it.
May 23, 2013

p.s. here's the note:

May 23, 2013

FYI - Obama's Counterterrorism speech starts @ 2:00 pm EDT - live link:

Next Up...

May 23, 2013 2:00 PM EDT

President Obama Speaks on Counterterrorism Policies

Washington, DC

http://www.whitehouse.gov/live
May 23, 2013

Wow.

That's a mistake I wouldn't want to make. Apparently Greuel started out with a big advantage, being both the labor candidate, a winner in Dem LA, and with a base in the SF Valley, conservative suburbia, where she grew up and where her old council district is (she's been city controller for about ten years I think).

But it seems she lost Valley voters when she got the DWP (water and powert dep't) union endorsement, because it turns out Valley voters need a lot of water and power in the summer and despise the DWP and the union wages and benefits it pays its workers. So that's why Greuel became the conservative candidate, and lost a lot of non-valley support to Garcetti, who wound up getting most of the DWP-hating valley dwellers anyway, per the LA Times pollster.

So essentially Garcetti out-campaigned her and came from behind to win, but politically they're very compatible, almost identical, and that worked against Greuel because it led to a low voter turnout, even for May -- 300,000+ and still counting, but probably less than 1/4 of eligible voters when it's over, per Ralph Schoenfeldt of the Pat Brown Institute at Cal State LA -- and a lot of Greuel voters stayed home. She was strongly supported by African American voters, according to the LAT pollster, I think because of her support for after-school and community programs, but they couldn't make up the loss.

So the long and short of it is that it was a win-win and Garcetti happened to win. Some interesting Clinton-Obama dynamics too but instead of tediously spelling it out like I did in a humongous post I just lost when my laptop choked (thanks Romney! ) I recommend the LA Times YouTube above. It's about 2 hours and the first 2 or 3 minutes are blank. The really juicy race-gender-Cinton-Obama polling stuff comes in the middle, at around 55 to 65 minutes. Patt and Ralph don't show up till about 1:30 but there's plenty to keep a DU political junkie in bliss the whole two hours!

May 22, 2013

thaks CHa, I"m pretty sure it's a non partisan race.

Last time I lived in LA Eric's city council district started across the street (well more or less) in echo park. Good guy, low key unlike his dad, who was a publicity seeker when he was DA, like his mentor Ira Reiner. Reiner either quit or lost to Garcetti pere after losing the McMartin Preschool case, a very nasty business, and Gil (Eric's dad) lost or quit after losing OJ. At least that's how I recall it.

Anyway it was hard to get a fix on who was winning even by people living there and Gruel was the clear media favorite so every time they appeared in local media (like local NPR stations) they always made her seem like a fait accompli. Turns out it wasn't. She wasn't terrible, in fact she was backed by the DWP and I think a couple of other City unions, but apparently she played that down and kind of ran as the stealth republican, or just assumed she'd win. Eric I know more about and I'm glad he won. But apparently it surprised everybody, especially the 8-point margin.

LA Times discussion with 2 local regulars, Patt Morrison and Ralph SHoensein:



WSJ analysis, with the typical WSJ slant:

Los Angeles councilman Eric Garcetti has earned the misfortune of replacing term-limited Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa this July. The bright-eyed, 42-year-old Democrat may have had higher ambitions, but his political future now looks as hazy as the Los Angeles sky.

Mr. Garcetti defeated controller Wendy Greuel by eight points in what is being reported as the most expensive and lowest turnout race in the city's history. The political upstart focused his attacks on Ms. Greuel's labor support, which she unsuccessfully sought to down play. But her bigger failing was that she didn't have a plan to revive economic growth in the city or to balance its lopsided books without rescinding a pay increase for public employees or modifying retirement benefits.

Mr. Garcetti presented a more optimistic vision and at least paid lip service to economic growth. He also won the endorsement of Republican Kevin James, who came in third place in the March primary, as well as the support of the Hollywood celebrities Mr. Garcetti represents on the city council. He promised to re-make Los Angeles in Hollywood's chic image—e.g., carless—and L.A. drivers presumably didn't hold this against him.

more: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324659404578498882049036200.html
May 22, 2013

Weiner handles himself expertly in YouTube released Tuesday night

Admitting that he has a hard road ahead and showing a firm resolve, former House Member Anthony Weiner announced his bid for Mayor of New York in a video released on You Tube Tuesday night. Weiner is trying to make a political comeback, two years after he resigned after posting raunchy pictures on Twitter. (May 22)



more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/22/anthony-weiner-2013-mayoral-race_n_3316704.html

(video description summarized)

May 22, 2013

Eric Garcetti wins race for L.A. mayor; Greuel concedes

Source: Los Angeles Times


Garcetti's victory caps a nearly two-year campaign that saw a record $33 million spent by the candidates and outside groups.

By Seema Mehta and Laura J. Nelson
May 22, 2013, 3:27 a.m.

Wendy Greuel called Eric Garcetti early Wednesday morning to concede the mayoral election, a Greuel campaign source told the Times, ending a two-year campaign to determine Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa's successor and the new political leader of Los Angeles.

Garcetti will be the first elected Jewish mayor of the city. At 42, he will also be the youngest in more than a century. He is scheduled to take office July 1. "Thank you Los Angeles," Garcetti wrote in a Tweet posted at 2:52 a.m. "The hard work begins but I am honored to lead this city for the next four years. Let's make this a great city again."

During early returns Tuesday, Greuel led the mayor's race by a slight margin. But as the night wore on, Garcetti's lead grew. Election tallies from the City Clerk's office posted at 1:38 a.m., with nearly 73% of precincts reporting, showed Greuel had fallen eight points behind Garcetti.

After seeing those numbers—Greuel 46%, Garcetti 54%—she called Garcetti at 1:42 a.m. to concede the race.

Read more: http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-ln-garcetti-wins-race-for-mayor-20130522,0,6850215.story



Squeaker, but Eric's the man. Both Dems.
May 22, 2013

*AHEM* Important announcement! Please read carefully:

Yes folks, it's official:



The long lost dollar has come back to the fold!





Read all about it: http://www.democraticunderground.com/11029992#post14






Profile Information

Gender: Male
Hometown: El Pueblo de Nuestra Senora la Reina de los Angeles
Home country: US
Current location: East of East L.A.
Member since: Sun Jan 20, 2013, 08:15 PM
Number of posts: 15,512
Latest Discussions»ucrdem's Journal