April 6, 2015

5 Things 'Pro-Lifers' Should Support If They Are Actually 'Pro-Family' - The National Memo

Those who offer no solutions to poor families while America has one of the highest poverty rates in the free world have no right to call themselves "pro-family."

Read More
http://link.nationalmemo.com/5390d3d3dd52b8141a0aafe52gowk.5gq8/VSJus0mOsoktL86JA91b0

April 5, 2015

The Reading Brain in the Digital Age: The Science of Paper versus Screens - Scientific American

This morning on Up With Steve Kornacki they had a brief discussion on whether cursive should be part of Common Core. The general opinion was 'no.' I was disappointed in their short-sightedness and educational ignorance. One even said that letter writing is a "lost art," implying it's pointless to teach kids to put pen to paper.

It's a shame that because something is a "lost art," some think it is not worth saving. But while there is still scientific uncertainty, studies indicate we're still a tactile species, meaning touch enhances learning -- the printed word neans more to our brains than mere images.

•••

The Reading Brain in the Digital Age: The Science of Paper versus Screens - Scientific American

Since at least the 1980s researchers in many different fields—including psychology, computer engineering, and library and information science—have investigated such questions in more than one hundred published studies. The matter is by no means settled. Before 1992 most studies concluded that people read slower, less accurately and less comprehensively on screens than on paper. Studies published since the early 1990s, however, have produced more inconsistent results: a slight majority has confirmed earlier conclusions, but almost as many have found few significant differences in reading speed or comprehension between paper and screens. And recent surveys suggest that although most people still prefer paper—especially when reading intensively—attitudes are changing as tablets and e-reading technology improve and reading digital books for facts and fun becomes more common. In the U.S., e-books currently make up between 15 and 20 percent of all trade book sales.

Even so, evidence from laboratory experiments, polls and consumer reports indicates that modern screens and e-readers fail to adequately recreate certain tactile experiences of reading on paper that many people miss and, more importantly, prevent people from navigating long texts in an intuitive and satisfying way. In turn, such navigational difficulties may subtly inhibit reading comprehension. Compared with paper, screens may also drain more of our mental resources while we are reading and make it a little harder to remember what we read when we are done. A parallel line of research focuses on people's attitudes toward different kinds of media. Whether they realize it or not, many people approach computers and tablets with a state of mind less conducive to learning than the one they bring to paper.

More
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/reading-paper-screens/