Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hill2016

hill2016's Journal
hill2016's Journal
September 16, 2015

If universal health care saves 50% from total health care costs, why didn't Vermont switch to it?

Somehow Vermont didn't want to raise taxes to pay for the massive *increase* in health care spending, let alone break even, let alone find 50% health care savings.

Oh and if it saves so much money why didn't Bernie use his bully pulpit to get Vermont to switch so they can benefit from the massive savings?

Note: this is not a normative judgment on whether the US should adopt a universal health care system but a positive statement that a universal health care system will result in total increased health care spending.



Profile Information

Gender: Do not display
Current location: New York City
Member since: Fri May 29, 2015, 08:51 PM
Number of posts: 1,772
Latest Discussions»hill2016's Journal