Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Myrddin

Myrddin's Journal
Myrddin's Journal
June 4, 2019

The Queen of The United Kingdom - some clarification

She invited them – she should refuse to meet them – why would they tolerate insults to the Duchess - etc. (not quotes, nor identifying individual posters, just a contextual selection)

I think I could be forgiven for concluding that, maybe one or two, DUers appear to be under the misapprehension that QEII is an 'Absolute' Monarch, she is not. Please allow me to clear this up, she is a 'Constitutional' Monarch.

To take a line from the constitutional link above, this sums it up quite nicely –

"...Thomas Macaulay, has defined a constitutional monarch as "A sovereign who reigns but does not rule"."

The Queen does not get to make decisions as to who gets a 'State Visit', that falls to the UK Government. HMQ may be consulted but, ultimately, it's not her decision. She hosts the visit 'on behalf' of the UK (Gov), and is expected to do so in a diplomatic manner, whether she wishes to, or not.

In theory, yes, she could refuse to host foreign heads of state that she doesn't much care for, or even privately despises, but if she did, without very good reason, The United Kingdom would be the 'United Republic' by 2020?

In summary, she has little, if any, choice in the matter.

Also, I don't doubt Harry is incensed by Trump's remarks about Meghan, but his allegience to The Queen, and the diplomatic obligations of royalty, will far outweigh his urge to hang a Liverpool Kiss on the Orange Arsehole?

I Hope this clears up perceptions of monarchical power in UK.


June 4, 2019

Assistance Please - The Last Word - censored in...

...Qatar/ME?

LOD was showing excerpts from the Kushener interview. When Kushner was questioned about MBS and Kashoggi the cable tv provider cut the transmission to a commercial break. That was no case of incompetence nor a coincidence. Somebody didn't want the ME audience to see what transpired.

Can anyone watching TLW let me know if the answer Kushner gave was significant? I can't imagine LOD would feature this clip without good reason?

Thanks in advance.

Profile Information

Member since: Thu Dec 31, 2015, 12:07 PM
Number of posts: 327
Latest Discussions»Myrddin's Journal