Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tragl1

Tragl1's Journal
Tragl1's Journal
February 10, 2017

#savethebees

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/feb/10/trump-rusty-patched-bumblebee-extinction-regulations?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
Disturbing article from the Guardian, another byproduct of this illegitimate, pile of orange TwitLer, we have in the White House. I'm just beyond the point of rage, we have to get this ass out of the White House.

Poor Bees
February 1, 2017

Trump Mexico Troops?

Is this article for real I can't find much of it anywhere else, did Trump threaten to use troops against Narco traffickers in Mexico?

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/02/i-dont-need-the-mexicans-report-claims-trump-threatened-to-send-troops-to-mexico-in-call-with-nieto/

January 12, 2017

Tom Udall *facepalm*

Tom Udall
Washington, DC
531 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington DC, 20510
(202) 224-6621

Please, can get some democrats to give our party representatives some hell when it seems they are not taking to heart, the seriousness of who it is that is going to be Secretary of State. Just call his office now, I'm a New Mexican resident and very disappointed of my kid glove senator. And his light approach to climate change denier-rexassauras.

*One long slow facepalm*

Thanks Y'all
Link is to huffpo piece about weak dem's. My senator is one smh....
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5876ea3ce4b092a6cae54c22

June 7, 2016

Um you can't read the TPP

https://theintercept.com/2015/06/13/cant-read-tpp-cant-find-congress/

Are you seriously arguing pro TPP? Wow, I smell a plant. If you claim to be pro-consumer by definition you cannot also be pro-TPP. Those two don't go together unless you have convoluted capitalism and humanism, which is no bueno. Anyways, the context to many of those bills is they have given up/alienated rights of workers/individuals protections, not gone far enough. So it's a matter of perspective and context.

Historically for example, you can say oh wow, look what Columbus did, crossed the ocean and all that, yay, but he killed how many native Arawacks and mainland Indians through genocide and slavery?

Or a more pertinent example take the Clintons crime bill of the 90's, she and Bill like to tout the lowest unemployment rate statistic for African Americans. Well if you add in the incarceration rate by product of said legislation the net effect is that unemployment essentially stayed unchanged, but the cultural and societal impact, well that's just barely being understood today. It wasn't good though, the decimation of the black community being its after effect.

I'm just after truth and fair context, a lot of those bills are poor retreads of a tire of corporate power. Women will still make less than men, the latest bill didn't really address the inherent sexism in hiring/employment. So to argue the democrats and Clinton by proxy are the next heralding of an progressive movement.

Well, I chortle.

I am chortling now.

April 6, 2016

Firearms insurance?

What would be the general consensus on the DU boards, about making firearms owners carry firearms insurance? I have been looking for threads, but was wondering if anyone had any thoughts? I like the idea of this. Thanks

March 16, 2016

Donate!

Just sent another 35 bucks to Bernie, keep believing. I actually think he's having a decent night if you consider no one gave him a chance 6 months ago, look at what he has done. Think what will happen when he wins NY and CA? It could very will happen.

March 10, 2016

Clinton's Fracking:What is her position?

Look, I'm not going to bash Clinton here. I will just let her own words be the deciding factor for those that read this post. I will say this though, I actually would prefer her over any of the republicans, but it's hard for me to support any candidate that adopts this position on fracking.

"An investigation by Mother Jones found that Hillary Clinton personally lobbied for U.S. fracking rights overseas as secretary of state. Speaking at a 2010 conference of foreign ministers, Clinton said, “I know that in some places [it] is controversial, but [shale] gas is the cleanest fossil fuel available for power today."

Read the whole article here: https://theintercept.com/2016/03/09/hillary-clinton-wants-to-regulate-fracking-but-still-accepts-a-lot-of-fracking-money/

For some of us Sanders is the only viable environmental solution we have left. A new study out says climate change is happening even faster than we thought. Here is a link from the Gaurdian. http://gu.com/p/4hdqe?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

All I am asking is for the persons that support Clinton, hold your own candidates feet to the fire on this issue. I won't let Bernie get away with anything less than a total ban, I want my kids to have an inhabitable planet. I also hope that people that support Bernie, also take this stance. Zero fracking.

Thanks

Profile Information

Member since: Sat Feb 20, 2016, 06:16 PM
Number of posts: 104
Latest Discussions»Tragl1's Journal