Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Buckeyeblue
Buckeyeblue's Journal
Buckeyeblue's Journal
July 6, 2018
How about this for a trade off...
45 seems to be into making deals. Let's trade funding for the wall for the Supreme Court pick. We can even go with Garland. If 45 nominates Garland, Dems will pass wall funding.
I know it's not ideal but if we can win in 2020, we can then stop the wall. If we can't win in 2020, Ginsberg's seat will likely come open during the term, at some point, so we'll be toast either way.
As unappealing as it is, I think it is worth doing.
Profile Information
Member since: Thu Feb 2, 2017, 03:31 PMNumber of posts: 5,406