Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
stopdiggin
stopdiggin's Journal
stopdiggin's Journal
January 8, 2020
A One-Word Accusation Swirls Around Trumps Deadly Strike: Assassination
snip-
Government powers to target people abroad are becoming broader as well as more contested and more complex, said Susan Hennessey, executive editor of Lawfare, a legal affairs site. The term assassination is kind of the converse of that, an identification of where the government has exceeded its authority and violated its own ban.
Past administrations have widened that authority so substantially that, if you surveyed every legal scholar, youre probably going to see a fairly strong agreement that this is probably lawful, she said, referring to Mr. Suleimanis killing.
But that would not make his killing just, moral or wise, Ms. Hennessey stressed, only that it would fall within legal precedents set by past administrations. And any rationale remains hypothetical. The administration has presented no legal justification, raising concerns that it may have acted without first establishing the orders legality.
-snip
http://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/07/world/middleeast/iran-soleimani-assassination.html?
Was it assassination? Was it illegal?
Good read on assassination, definitions, executive power and mission creep, legal vs illegal .. and how we got here with targeted killing.
A One-Word Accusation Swirls Around Trumps Deadly Strike: Assassination
snip-
Government powers to target people abroad are becoming broader as well as more contested and more complex, said Susan Hennessey, executive editor of Lawfare, a legal affairs site. The term assassination is kind of the converse of that, an identification of where the government has exceeded its authority and violated its own ban.
Past administrations have widened that authority so substantially that, if you surveyed every legal scholar, youre probably going to see a fairly strong agreement that this is probably lawful, she said, referring to Mr. Suleimanis killing.
But that would not make his killing just, moral or wise, Ms. Hennessey stressed, only that it would fall within legal precedents set by past administrations. And any rationale remains hypothetical. The administration has presented no legal justification, raising concerns that it may have acted without first establishing the orders legality.
-snip
http://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/07/world/middleeast/iran-soleimani-assassination.html?
Profile Information
Member since: Fri Jul 6, 2018, 06:29 PMNumber of posts: 13,182