Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)

5. Thanks for the links.

Reply to RainDog (Reply #4)

Mon Jul 30, 2012, 08:47 PM

Jul 2012

I guess what I don't get is in asking a lawyer (judge) to take on the role of a scientist and make that determination - basically going against flawed HHS data. Glad they are finally getting a hearing on it, it is just something I never knew happened.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Medical Marijuana Rescheduling to Go Before D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals [View all] RainDog Jul 2012 OP

The justices would be VERY wise to find favor for ASA. Panasonic Jul 2012 #1

I agree RainDog Jul 2012 #2

Not following this. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #3

This started 10 (TEN!) years ago RainDog Jul 2012 #4

Thanks for the links. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #5

there were 22 years of court challenges to the first ruling RainDog Jul 2012 #6

Thanks for keeping the board up to date with what is happening with this. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #9

I miss a lot - but try to keep up as best as I can RainDog Jul 2012 #10

Kicked and recommended for logic and justice; it's way overdue. Uncle Joe Jul 2012 #7

hugs to you, Uncle Joe RainDog Jul 2012 #12

Likewise, Raindog. Uncle Joe Jul 2012 #13

K & R stopwastingmymoney Jul 2012 #8

The US Dpt of health an human services got a patent on it, that should sum it up. tdb63 Jul 2012 #11