Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Association removes Laura Ingalls Wilder's name from award [View all]quickesst
(6,280 posts)35. Exactly
Applying modern morals and standards to people and events of the past without taking into consideration the morals and standards of that time will result in a flawed analysis. One might believe, in their opinion, that they are a good person with high morals and standards now, but, one thing they cannot do is state emphatically that they would have been the same person then.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I agree with you. Just like Mark Twain. They wrote as things were at the time.
sinkingfeeling
Jun 2018
#4
I don't have an issue with this. "Products of their time" shouldn't be held up as examples for the
WhiskeyGrinder
Jun 2018
#16
The naming of a top ALA award after her was also a product of its time, and times have changed
fishwax
Jun 2018
#18
Dismantling institutional oppression means looking at our heroes critically, as well as our enemies.
WhiskeyGrinder
Jun 2018
#19
There's also the part where the organization that issues the award started having a discussion
WhiskeyGrinder
Jun 2018
#39
Nothing is lost by renaming this award to more clearly and explicitly include all young readers.
WhiskeyGrinder
Jun 2018
#40
Hell, I bet most of the people complaining the loudest had no idea the award existed.
sweetloukillbot
Jun 2018
#48