Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Sophia4

(3,515 posts)
51. Learn and teach history.
Tue Jun 26, 2018, 02:51 AM
Jun 2018

Those who understand history can put ideas in their historical context.

The Romans had many slave. They also built aqueducts and did admirable things.

History teaches us to strive to improve society, but also to appreciate the progress we have made on many social issues.

When I was a child, most mothers did not work and were economically in some cases and cruelly dependent on their husbands. Many professions were completely barred to women.

Times have changed. We should not judge our mothers and grandmothers but rather be proud of the progress we have made as a society.

Most important, we should remember that we cannot judge ourselves as the future will judge us. On many issues including healthcare and access to education and continuing education, history will judge us harshly because we are very backward in those and other areas of our lives.

And what we are doing to our environment?????

The impact of our burning fossil fuels on future generations (if mankind survives) will make Laura Ingalls Wilder look like a saint.

Your link is bad. madaboutharry Jun 2018 #1
Thank you exboyfil Jun 2018 #3
Learn and teach history. Sophia4 Jun 2018 #51
She lived in her time treestar Jun 2018 #2
It also makes a good jumping off point Bettie Jun 2018 #32
So true. It is tougher to find these attitudes today treestar Jun 2018 #37
I agree with you. Just like Mark Twain. They wrote as things were at the time. sinkingfeeling Jun 2018 #4
GMTA. 3catwoman3 Jun 2018 #6
And how about Mark Twain? 3catwoman3 Jun 2018 #5
+ 1 no_hypocrisy Jun 2018 #9
And how was she supposed to portray them? nt Trek4Truth Jun 2018 #7
Don't agree to banning books . . . peggysue2 Jun 2018 #8
I don't see how this is a "book banning"... Wounded Bear Jun 2018 #11
Not throwing her books in the fire . . . yet peggysue2 Jun 2018 #15
It does get absurd treestar Jun 2018 #36
I've never heard of her so... lame54 Jun 2018 #20
You really have never heard of her? Tipperary Jun 2018 #24
She was the author of "The Little House on The Prairie" Books. madaboutharry Jun 2018 #26
of course i've heard of the show... lame54 Jun 2018 #38
She was born in 1867 Bettie Jun 2018 #33
But then you didn't read the books treestar Jun 2018 #34
She was a pioneer woman LeftInTX Jun 2018 #43
I don't think any rational person is proposing exboyfil Jun 2018 #13
I wouldn't expect any rational person to ban any book, ever peggysue2 Jun 2018 #17
Changing the name of an award isn't censorship sweetloukillbot Jun 2018 #46
I can only think this is an example of academic group think exboyfil Jun 2018 #10
Agree, we need to do both JI7 Jun 2018 #12
The American Library Association is still giving acknowledgement to Wilder csziggy Jun 2018 #14
The new name is more reflective of what the award actually is DeminPennswoods Jun 2018 #25
Yes, and I am all for it csziggy Jun 2018 #42
I don't have an issue with this. "Products of their time" shouldn't be held up as examples for the WhiskeyGrinder Jun 2018 #16
And Wilder's work has been an example for a long time. Orsino Jun 2018 #44
The naming of a top ALA award after her was also a product of its time, and times have changed fishwax Jun 2018 #18
Dismantling institutional oppression means looking at our heroes critically, as well as our enemies. WhiskeyGrinder Jun 2018 #19
Look at her books critically, keep the name on award Loki Liesmith Jun 2018 #31
There's also the part where the organization that issues the award started having a discussion WhiskeyGrinder Jun 2018 #39
Yes. I don't agree with that part. Loki Liesmith Jun 2018 #41
I agree with the ALA. nt Exotica Jun 2018 #21
I don't agree with this at all Raine Jun 2018 #22
I don't think they're that bad. betsuni Jun 2018 #23
My opinion is... quickesst Jun 2018 #27
Yes I have to wonder where it will stop exboyfil Jun 2018 #30
Exactly quickesst Jun 2018 #35
Don't worry MaryMagdaline Jun 2018 #28
They listen to and read Fox News exboyfil Jun 2018 #29
Nothing is lost by renaming this award to more clearly and explicitly include all young readers. WhiskeyGrinder Jun 2018 #40
+1 fishwax Jun 2018 #45
Hell, I bet most of the people complaining the loudest had no idea the award existed. sweetloukillbot Jun 2018 #48
DW Griffith was an incredible, pioneering filmmaker sweetloukillbot Jun 2018 #47
Not even remotely analogous BannonsLiver Jun 2018 #49
Racism is okay in children? sweetloukillbot Jun 2018 #50
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Association removes Laura...»Reply #51