Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

joshcryer

(62,269 posts)

16. Yeah, you're right, but I don't think it's not workable completely. Just not viable, imho.

Reply to quaker bill (Reply #15)

Tue Jan 3, 2012, 06:31 AM

Jan 2012

The kind of planning you're talking about isn't really viable for all the high profile targets, especially if they're on the move a lot. And the less planning / training you have (they actually built a mock compound to train in) the more higher the risk is. So it would never happen. But I think at least then, especially if you held to justice and trials, we'd have moral standing.

Just my humble opinion.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Unaccountable Killing Machines: The True Cost of U.S. Drones [View all] Luminous Animal Jan 2012 OP

Fasinating article. may I suggest to the author a small edit to the 2nd to last paragraph: Devil_Fish Jan 2012 #1

Ah yes. That is a good suggestion. Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #5

Really good article SixthSense Jan 2012 #2

k and r nashville_brook Jan 2012 #3

An opinion piece quaker bill Jan 2012 #4

Are we at war with Pakistan and Yemen? Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #6

Aren't we using weapons to kill people there? quaker bill Jan 2012 #7

Sorry I read your original post too quickly and overlooked your point.. Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #10

I agree with you, if you have cause to go after someone, they should get a jury trial. joshcryer Jan 2012 #14

Boots on the ground "got Bin Laden," with no lives lost. joshcryer Jan 2012 #13

Using that one operation as a model quaker bill Jan 2012 #15

Yeah, you're right, but I don't think it's not workable completely. Just not viable, imho. joshcryer Jan 2012 #16

I am not taken with death penalty trials for anyone quaker bill Jan 2012 #17

Obama has it right. Give firm instructions then put mission execution in the bluestate10 Jan 2012 #8

How do these "incidents" not qualifyas summary extra-legal executions? gratuitous Jan 2012 #9

K&R (nt) T S Justly Jan 2012 #11

Google "targeted killing," the US has determined that it's perfectly legal. joshcryer Jan 2012 #12