Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: We've moved into a new category...Treason [View all]ooky
(8,920 posts)18. Consider this -
- 12 Russian military officers just indicted for cyber espionage against the United States.
- United States President goes to see Russian leader who gave those officers their orders, 3 days later.
- U.S. President ignores the indictments, says nothing, does nothing, effectively aiding and abetting the Russian leader who attacked the United States.
What definition of treason would not fit that scenario?
Dems in Congress need to be all over this come Monday.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
118 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I do remember seeing some not-pleasant pictures (BW). And yes, video was an anachronism.
erronis
Jul 2018
#28
"Treason is to betray your country and go against the governing body whereas espionage
RKP5637
Jul 2018
#7
Definitely at this stage, especially after yesterday. ... and the GOP pending attempt to
RKP5637
Jul 2018
#12
It's incredible!!! I'm really wondering if Trump IS a russian operative with something up
RKP5637
Jul 2018
#26
I have been in favor of the guillotine for the orange one and his co-conspirators
mnhtnbb
Jul 2018
#58
The positive outcome of this scenario would be to finally pit him against Congress
Saguaro
Jul 2018
#71
If Tribe doesn't know the definition of "war" in the Constitution sad for him.
former9thward
Jul 2018
#48
We could (maybe should) declare war and take out their comms and electricity non-militarily.
greyl
Jul 2018
#86
The topic is treason and the definition of war. Are you intentionally missing the point?
greyl
Jul 2018
#88
Perhaps. I will allow there is a risk to enlarging the definition of treason.
TomSlick
Jul 2018
#116
Yes, yes, yes, the constitutional purists continue to correct our def'n of treason
Mr. Ected
Jul 2018
#16
Yes, It is treason, not "#Collusion, #conspire, and #traitor" AND they did not influence the
Amaryllis
Jul 2018
#74