General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: We've moved into a new category...Treason [View all]TomSlick
(11,013 posts)There is no definition of the word "war" in the Constitution. The Constitution gives the Congress the power to declare war but it does not require a declaration of war for a state of war to exist.
As a matter of interpretation, in the absence of a definition, words are given their usual meaning. There is no question the Russian attack is not an "international armed conflict" within the meaning of the Geneva Convention. However, both the Constitution and the Geneva Convention predate the advent of cyber warfare. A reasonable definition of war today must include a cyber attack. If Russia conducts a cyber attack that cause US nuclear power plants to melt-down killing hundreds of Americans, that would surely be an act of war. A Russian cyber attack on US elections is no less an act of war.
The Russian military attacked us. Sure, no ordinance was expended but it was a military attack nevertheless. If the military of one country attacks another, it is an act of war.