Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Bernie Sanders on MSNBC up NOW 8:30 est [View all]Cha
(296,750 posts)23. Ha! Good question, lapucelle.. maybe
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Cha, why do you keep repeating this? It makes no sense. A democrat runs against him in the primary.
JCanete
Aug 2018
#46
the lie is that this is to prevent democrats from running agains thim. They can in the primary
JCanete
Aug 2018
#54
"but that's just oh so sad when those of us at DU hold onto something so easily refutable just
betsuni
Aug 2018
#53
well so long as you keep them to yourself I guess you can't be embarassed by them. nt
JCanete
Aug 2018
#58
I believe that is the case Cha yes, thank you for acknowledging it. This gives dems an opporutinty
JCanete
Aug 2018
#91
uh...okay. My point isn't to try to make him a hero because of this. I'm unfortunately
JCanete
Aug 2018
#95
Just turned the TV on, but I think he just said he wouldn't accept the nomination
Rustynaerduwell
Aug 2018
#4
If he said that, that means he is saying he won't run in 2020, and the reason I say that because he
still_one
Aug 2018
#11
If he runs as an independent he knows he will lose, and if he tries the same thing he did in 2016,
still_one
Aug 2018
#41
So apparently he's only leaving open the possibility of running as a spoiler. n/t
pnwmom
Aug 2018
#40
Why is he offended? By every definition, Bernie is as 'establishment' as it gets
Blue_Tires
Aug 2018
#9
hehe what? By every definition you say? I guess by every definition you yourself concoct.
JCanete
Aug 2018
#48
becuase that's how you've personally decided to define it. That's pretty weak too.
JCanete
Aug 2018
#57
personally...weak...gained purchase into that world...establishment...hung up on...
betsuni
Aug 2018
#60
He would have been on his guard, Ali Velshi is a really intelligent interviewer, not just asking
OnDoutside
Aug 2018
#49
Garr, that's also silly. There's the primary and then there's the GE. I'm quite capable of making
JCanete
Aug 2018
#82
What we don't know, because you have no evidence to support the idea, is that having a
JCanete
Aug 2018
#84
No I don't, you really need to point to me where the Mueller indictments prove that the primaries
JCanete
Aug 2018
#86
Okay. Made a silly face....looked silly. Back on topic, what point are you trying to make with
JCanete
Aug 2018
#93