Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
The NYT needs to rid of this idiot Gothmog Sep 2018 #1
Hear, hear! BigmanPigman Sep 2018 #2
+1 dalton99a Sep 2018 #14
Yes indeed. nt SunSeeker Sep 2018 #17
Malcolm has a comment - DURHAM D Sep 2018 #3
Malcom nails it, as usual. Michael S. Schmidt is getting ripped to shreds on Twitter. SunSeeker Sep 2018 #18
That leak is solely attempting to emasculate Rosenstein. Nevilledog Sep 2018 #21
I agree with Malcom Nance Gothmog Sep 2018 #26
What has happened to Schmidt & the Times lately? donkeypoofed Sep 2018 #4
The NYT coverage of e-mail was horrible Gothmog Sep 2018 #27
Schmidt is worse IMO BannonsLiver Sep 2018 #5
Yep. dalton99a Sep 2018 #16
A lot are cancelling their subscriptions because of him meadowlark5 Sep 2018 #6
I cancelled today redstateblues Sep 2018 #11
Good Gothmog Sep 2018 #13
You're not the only one telling him that on Twitter. SunSeeker Sep 2018 #19
Remember Trump gave him a exclusive at Miralago MattP Sep 2018 #7
Exactly. nt SunSeeker Sep 2018 #20
That's not how Woodward did it, Mike. dchill Sep 2018 #8
Rosenstein is the Polly Hennessey Sep 2018 #9
What an ass ProudLib72 Sep 2018 #10
Michael S. Schmidt is a goddamn White House mouthpiece posing as a journalist dalton99a Sep 2018 #12
I turn off the TV when this idiot is on Gothmog Sep 2018 #15
Why not simply hire Bill Shine as Editor-in-Chief? Anon-C Sep 2018 #28
What are the odds his source is Makeitup Haberman ? OnDoutside Sep 2018 #22
Judy, Judy, Judas (R) Achilleaze Sep 2018 #23
Schmidt's shifty eyes are a dead giveaway. He's quite clumsy when giving oasis Sep 2018 #24
Yikes ck4829 Sep 2018 #25
something sinister is going on n/t dajoki Sep 2018 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT's Mike S. Schmidt: th...»Reply #28