Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Should Trump be impeached for inquiring if the D O J can prosecute his political enemies? [View all]
Trump Wanted to Order Justice Dept. to Prosecute Comey and Clinton
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/20/us/politics/pre
WASHINGTON President Trump told the White House counsel in the spring that he wanted to order the Justice Department to prosecute two of his political adversaries: his 2016 challenger, Hillary Clinton, and the former F.B.I. director James B. Comey, according to two people familiar with the conversation.
The lawyer, Donald F. McGahn II, rebuffed the president, saying that he had no authority to order a prosecution. Mr. McGahn said that while he could request an investigation, that too could prompt accusations of abuse of power. To underscore his point, Mr. McGahn had White House lawyers write a memo for Mr. Trump warning that if he asked law enforcement to investigate his rivals, he could face a range of consequences, including possible impeachment.
The encounter was one of the most blatant examples yet of how Mr. Trump views the typically independent Justice Department as a tool to be wielded against his political enemies. It took on additional significance in recent weeks when Mr. McGahn left the White House and Mr. Trump appointed a relatively inexperienced political loyalist, Matthew G. Whitaker, as the acting attorney general.
It is unclear whether Mr. Trump read Mr. McGahns memo or whether he pursued the prosecutions further. But the president has continued to privately discuss the matter, including the possible appointment of a second special counsel to investigate both Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Comey, according to two people who have spoken to Mr. Trump about the issue. He has also repeatedly expressed disappointment in the F.B.I. director, Christopher A. Wray, for failing to more aggressively investigate Mrs. Clinton, calling him weak, one of the people said.
Read more: New York Times
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/20/us/politics/pre
WASHINGTON President Trump told the White House counsel in the spring that he wanted to order the Justice Department to prosecute two of his political adversaries: his 2016 challenger, Hillary Clinton, and the former F.B.I. director James B. Comey, according to two people familiar with the conversation.
The lawyer, Donald F. McGahn II, rebuffed the president, saying that he had no authority to order a prosecution. Mr. McGahn said that while he could request an investigation, that too could prompt accusations of abuse of power. To underscore his point, Mr. McGahn had White House lawyers write a memo for Mr. Trump warning that if he asked law enforcement to investigate his rivals, he could face a range of consequences, including possible impeachment.
The encounter was one of the most blatant examples yet of how Mr. Trump views the typically independent Justice Department as a tool to be wielded against his political enemies. It took on additional significance in recent weeks when Mr. McGahn left the White House and Mr. Trump appointed a relatively inexperienced political loyalist, Matthew G. Whitaker, as the acting attorney general.
It is unclear whether Mr. Trump read Mr. McGahns memo or whether he pursued the prosecutions further. But the president has continued to privately discuss the matter, including the possible appointment of a second special counsel to investigate both Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Comey, according to two people who have spoken to Mr. Trump about the issue. He has also repeatedly expressed disappointment in the F.B.I. director, Christopher A. Wray, for failing to more aggressively investigate Mrs. Clinton, calling him weak, one of the people said.
Read more: New York Times
13 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Yes | |
10 (77%) |
|
No | |
3 (23%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should Trump be impeached for inquiring if the D O J can prosecute his political enemies? [View all]
DemocratSinceBirth
Nov 2018
OP
Except, according to the story, he asked about doing it, but didn't actually go ahead
onenote
Nov 2018
#10
The mere asking DOJ to prosecute his enemies is a clear abuse of power.
DemocratSinceBirth
Nov 2018
#14
My understanding was it was squashed by McGhan, it never went to DOJ. Doesn't matter
dem4decades
Nov 2018
#38
Well, we could talk about McConnell laughing his ass off if you'd prefer?
Pope George Ringo II
Nov 2018
#15
We can slow walk impeachment and he would be still be on trial when he runs for re-election.
DemocratSinceBirth
Nov 2018
#16
If that's how you demonstrate bravery, say hello to Custer and Lord Cardigan.
Pope George Ringo II
Nov 2018
#22
I voted No, because the votes aren't in the Senate, so no point going down that road. Indict his
OnDoutside
Nov 2018
#3
If he can lock up Hillary and James Comey he can lock up you and me.
DemocratSinceBirth
Nov 2018
#25
+1, he takes helpless peoples children from them as policy ... of course he would kill. There's no
uponit7771
Nov 2018
#42
No. But investigate the living shit out of him. Hound that fat bastard all the way to hell.
VOX
Nov 2018
#39
And then they would have had him lynched in the rotunda of the capitol building
Volaris
Nov 2018
#45