Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)DU doesn't need fewer regular posters in GD. [View all]
Last edited Wed Nov 28, 2018, 02:13 PM - Edit history (1)
It needs more. Every time we lose a regular, long-time contributor, it diminishes the value of the site to its readers. Content is everything! The more engaging content there is, the more people come and stay.
That is the essential formula that keeps sites alive and growing. Content is my business. Its value, particularly in attracting and retaining visitors, cannot be over-stated. We should not be driving away people who contribute excellent, non-offensive content here.
I'm just saying...
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
266 replies, 37824 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (191)
ReplyReply to this post
266 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When I get juried for this type of OP, I click that it was a malicious flagging.
TheBlackAdder
Nov 2018
#21
Not remotely accurate. JPR is all conspiracy theories. They had to agree to not discuss
R B Garr
Nov 2018
#187
During primary season it was those folks who juried peeps from DU...
Mike Rows His Boat
Nov 2018
#210
Do you consider providing objective evidence supporting a premise a "defense'?
LanternWaste
Nov 2018
#232
I don't get how you get too hard on Surandon, who has seemly finally got some sense...
brush
Nov 2018
#194
I am asking the younger generation to do their homework, educate themselves instead of targeting
Wintryjade
Nov 2018
#249
I think we are being given a great advantage watching first HRC and now Pelosi bringing our young
Wintryjade
Nov 2018
#242
I remember thinking that after looking at a "Where were you when JFK was assassinated?" thread'!
m-lekktor
Nov 2018
#248
That's why I don't post much. Every post opens you up for a flag by someone with a ax to grind.
TheBlackAdder
Nov 2018
#20
I use picture to back or enhance my words. You are correct. We have our style.
Wintryjade
Nov 2018
#64
I don't think you can express any opinion these days without pissing off someone
pecosbob
Nov 2018
#41
personally I vote up everything except personal attacks. its a discussion board right? nt
msongs
Nov 2018
#57
I've think sometimes jurists don't always go back and read the context of the thread
jcgoldie
Nov 2018
#170
Remember, "offense" is in the eye of the beholder. A post about GMO offends Monsanto
McCamy Taylor
Nov 2018
#124
Sometimes taking a DU break can be a good thing though, help get some perspective
uppityperson
Nov 2018
#151
Mr. Mineral Man, DU has been great since 2004 (when I started lurking and
akbacchus_BC
Nov 2018
#161