Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

EarlG

(21,935 posts)

3. Is the implication here though

Reply to ProudLib72 (Original post)

Tue Dec 11, 2018, 11:21 PM

Dec 2018

that Flynn has done something above and beyond merely being honest? As in, did he actually work on behalf of the prosecutor to get hold of additional information that they didn’t already have or know about (as opposed to just answering their questions without lying)?

Some have speculated that he may have worn a wire, for example.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Flynn Recommended Sentencing Bullshittery Reminds Me of My Students [View all] ProudLib72 Dec 2018 OP

It's the counter pardon... lame54 Dec 2018 #1

There may be complexities here empedocles Dec 2018 #2

Rachel said the judge can ignore the parties' recommendations entirely ProudLib72 Dec 2018 #5

Thank you, that needed to be spelled out. empedocles Dec 2018 #6

Is the implication here though EarlG Dec 2018 #3

That is a good point ProudLib72 Dec 2018 #7

I agree with you EarlG Dec 2018 #11

lol! Good points. It also makes me worry about Mueller. ecstatic Dec 2018 #4

We know enought to make a prima facie case empedocles Dec 2018 #8

Ditto, and there are a lot of other players as well - GOP leadership, for one. Mueller may be Amaryllis Dec 2018 #10

. . . 'wide and deep 'and . . . long. empedocles Dec 2018 #12

Maybe you should educate yourself on what he was charged with. former9thward Dec 2018 #9

Let me just ask you this: Why was Rump warned to get rid of Flynn? ProudLib72 Dec 2018 #13