Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OilemFirchen

(7,143 posts)
13. He's accidentally right, then.
Wed Dec 26, 2018, 08:46 PM
Dec 2018

I don't follow Silver, so was unaware that he was arguing that Russian disinformation didn't impact the 2016 election. If he's now inexplicably implying that it did, I would agree that this tweet is "bizarre". Apparently, his devotees seem to think that this is simply a joke. Whatever. I don't do personality cult shit, so I really don't care about this internecine battle being waged.

However, crap like the retweeted post from this inane account, begun early and accumulating throughout the campaign, absolutely did influence the outcome of the election. And yes, plenty of political scientists agree with me.

n.b.: I doubt that Trump will be running in 2020 anyway. I don't doubt that there is already a well-coordinated Russian campaign to, once again, disrupt the next election regardless of the candidates involved.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nate Silver's bizarre Twi...»Reply #13