Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bullshit. Your conclusion doesn't follow. manor321 Jan 2019 #1
Yes it fucking does Recursion Jan 2019 #3
Your OP is not accurate blogslut Jan 2019 #2
YES IT IS Recursion Jan 2019 #5
You think "not accurate" "not true" blogslut Jan 2019 #7
YES IT FUCKING IS Recursion Jan 2019 #9
This is truly getting surreal oberliner Jan 2019 #12
I'm fine with what I think. blogslut Jan 2019 #14
I'd be amazed at the lengths to which some will in order to excuse Leopold's fuck up. onenote Jan 2019 #42
I'm going to wait before having a hissy fit. n/t demmiblue Jan 2019 #4
I've waited 13 years since the last time he fabricated a story Recursion Jan 2019 #6
Waiting thirteen years is kind of bizarre. demmiblue Jan 2019 #13
Post removed Post removed Jan 2019 #27
Good lawd. n/t demmiblue Jan 2019 #29
Buzzfeed's story - and Mueller's team essentially saying WRONG - don't help cause of removing trump. Hoyt Jan 2019 #8
Post removed Post removed Jan 2019 #10
Your concern concerns me. John Fante Jan 2019 #17
Bookmarking. Welcome to DU. Enjoy your visit. n/t rzemanfl Jan 2019 #20
I joined in 2006, thanks (nt) Recursion Jan 2019 #28
It wasn't addressed to you. Was addressed to the one-post troll who wrote post #10 emulatorloo Jan 2019 #32
Thank you for fixing that misunderstanding while I slept. rzemanfl Jan 2019 #41
Of course! I read that troll's post before the jury hid it. I didn't want there to be any confusion emulatorloo Jan 2019 #46
Chuck Rosenberg just disagreed with you on Rachel manor321 Jan 2019 #11
I'd suggest pulling your head out of the sand Recursion Jan 2019 #16
Inaccurate doesn't mean wrong in every context uponit7771 Jan 2019 #43
Good to know.. thanks. Cha Jan 2019 #35
Um, how does this give Trump ammunition? John Fante Jan 2019 #15
You're joking, right? Recursion Jan 2019 #18
No, I'm not joking. How does this give Trump ammo John Fante Jan 2019 #19
Really? Charlotte Little Jan 2019 #31
Haven't you noticed that they always have talking points anyway ? That's why I don't worry UniteFightBack Jan 2019 #47
The sky isn't falling over this, sorry. John Fante Jan 2019 #48
The sky IS falling Charlotte Little Jan 2019 #51
I didn't see anything that says the story is fundamentally untrue YessirAtsaFact Jan 2019 #34
+1, inaccurate doesn't mean wrong in every context uponit7771 Jan 2019 #44
Even Woodward and Bernstein got some details wrong John Fante Jan 2019 #49
But let's look at the part you edited out... Towlie Jan 2019 #21
YOU CANNOT PRINT INACCURATE STATEMENTS Recursion Jan 2019 #23
This is false on its face uponit7771 Jan 2019 #45
Mueller's office neither said nor implied the quotes were fabricated. Takket Jan 2019 #22
That Recursion Jan 2019 #24
and another thing.......... Takket Jan 2019 #25
When did Buzzfeed admit that they fucked up? oberliner Jan 2019 #26
poor choice of words....... Takket Jan 2019 #36
Jesus Charlotte Little Jan 2019 #30
What exactly are they going to say? Takket Jan 2019 #37
Actually, it does matter how minor the inaccuracies are. Iggo Jan 2019 #33
The gymnastics some are doing to construe the Mueller team statement onenote Jan 2019 #38
Buzzfeed's reporting is meaningless for this Democrat. KY_EnviroGuy Jan 2019 #39
Everyone's trying to read tea leaves here Azathoth Jan 2019 #40
Do you always preach to people telling them what to do and think? MrGrieves Jan 2019 #50
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"BuzzFeed's description o...»Reply #45