General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 'Victim of religious bigotry': Tulsi Gabbard, 1st Hindu-American to run for US president [View all]oberliner
(58,724 posts)He seems awful to me and appears not to be a supporter of the Democratic Party and most Democrats.
Syria seems relevant to a discussion of Tulsi Gabbard since her views on that conflict are what many Democrats find to be most disagreeable about her. Or at least, one of the issues that most often comes up in discussing Gabbard is her views on Assad.
With that in mind, I am always curious to know what the general feeling is about how we should approach Assad, in particular, and the conflict in Syria overall.
Personally, I am not entirely sure what makes the most sense in terms of US involvement in Syria. Is Gabbard's position credible at all? Or is she completely off base? If she is completely off base, what would be a more credible position?
I would be very interested to hear your thoughts on that subject - or on Michael Harriot, if you'd like to share your opinions about him.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):