Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Mitch whines about a "massive federal takeover of elections," and Nancy responds. [View all]KY_EnviroGuy
(14,483 posts)37. Mr. Plutocracy speaks again.
Mitch is just upset because we're trying to tear down the means by which they built a Repug majority for the corporate world.
Corporate power all this free-market freak has ever been about. His lifeblood has always supporting Big Tobacco, Big Healthcare, or big anything that strips the public of power.
As we've been trying to do since he was first elected, Ditch Mitch......
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Mitch whines about a "massive federal takeover of elections," and Nancy responds. [View all]
Miles Archer
Jan 2019
OP
Perhaps we should follow Rove and embrace the term, thereby neutering its use.
TheBlackAdder
Feb 2019
#58
Agree. I've wondered why we get so upset about Democrat (or Liberal or even the "social" terms.)
erronis
Feb 2019
#66
ah, thanks. i haven't watched TV in 9 years. its harder to pick up in the written word.
Kurt V.
Jan 2019
#24
I've been schooled . still find it silly. words matter. this isn't one of them.
Kurt V.
Jan 2019
#34
Yep. It is. "DemocRAT" They never refer to "the Democratic Party" or the Democratic Senator. nt
Honeycombe8
Jan 2019
#46