Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

tama

(9,137 posts)
43. FBI definition
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 03:16 PM
Aug 2012

"Anarchism is a belief that society should have no government, laws, police, or any other authority. Having that belief is perfectly legal, and the majority of anarchists in the U.S. advocate change through non-violent, non-criminal means."
http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2010/november/anarchist_111610

FBI article is, of course, about "anarchist extremism", one of the four main threats of "domestic terrorism", others being:
- Sovereign citizen extremist threat
- Lone offender threat
- Eco-terrorist and animal rights extremist threats

Article continues:
"For today’s generation of American anarchist extremists, the rioting that disrupted the 1999 World Trade Organization meetings in Seattle is the standard by which they measure “success”—it resulted in millions of dollars in property damage and economic loss and injuries to hundreds of law enforcement officers and bystanders. But fortunately, they haven’t been able to duplicate what happened in Seattle…which may be a combination of the improved preparations of law enforcement as well as the disorganization of the movement."

The success of "anarchist extremism" (and of course representatives of many other political philosophies were also present) of Seattle was not "millions of dollars in property damage" etc., but that WTO process was interrupted and has been stagnated ever since, which was the purpose of the action.

OK, good enough, in that comparison the "standard of success" was not repeated by OWS, Wall Street is still corrupting politics and destroying our lives as before. That would have been indeed BIG, given that those who made the initiative were totally amazed by what it turned into, changing the national discourse and revealing how fed up so many people were with the system and how ready for radical changes. If anyone wonders why national security machines are targeting anarchists and naming them public enemy number one, that's why.

When is the last time this country faced a threat from anarchists? tama Aug 2012 #1
Threat? PCIntern Aug 2012 #2
Neither do I, as threat is something to be feared tama Aug 2012 #6
Occupy was a bourgeosie movement. nt TBF Aug 2012 #4
That too tama Aug 2012 #5
We caused more disruption when Nixon mined Haiphong harbor PCIntern Aug 2012 #8
Damn hippies tama Aug 2012 #12
We were something back then... PCIntern Aug 2012 #17
Nothing wrong with nostalgia tama Aug 2012 #21
It isn't... PCIntern Aug 2012 #22
"Here' referring to US, not just DU, I assume tama Aug 2012 #25
The intellectual roots of Occupy stem from anarchism (David Graeber and coalition_unwilling Aug 2012 #50
Seattle and anti-war tama Aug 2012 #55
Grammar Nazi (French) here: 'bourgeoisie' is a noun. Stylistically better to say coalition_unwilling Aug 2012 #16
ok :) nt TBF Aug 2012 #26
A primer - leftists were most notably purged TBF Aug 2012 #3
So whose left of left? tama Aug 2012 #7
You're going to have to clarify - TBF Aug 2012 #9
It's not just one dimensional tama Aug 2012 #10
that's why anarchists wind up taking the side of the bourgeoisie against the proletariat BOG PERSON Aug 2012 #13
Anarcho-syndicalism tama Aug 2012 #15
anarchists would be wise to heed the saying BOG PERSON Aug 2012 #19
Isolation? tama Aug 2012 #23
I must say tama Aug 2012 #18
i get my opinions from the same place every american political poseur gets their opinions BOG PERSON Aug 2012 #20
Weird tama Aug 2012 #24
"how can you claim anarchists 'don't have any affiliated unions'?" BOG PERSON Aug 2012 #28
Your claim is demonstrably false, both historically and currently. Comrade Grumpy Aug 2012 #39
This message was self-deleted by its author BOG PERSON Aug 2012 #53
They oppose unionism? Ever heard of the IWW? Comrade Grumpy Aug 2012 #30
Or the CNT for that matter which before the Civil War was the largest union in Spain. Puregonzo1188 Aug 2012 #44
Oh, I dunno about that.... MADem Aug 2012 #27
From your link tama Aug 2012 #29
I never suggested they were popular, or even a substantial "movement." MADem Aug 2012 #34
I didn't suggest tama Aug 2012 #38
We're good...I know some times, because of the limits of the written word, I've often MADem Aug 2012 #42
Localism vs nationalism tama Aug 2012 #45
National Anarchism is to anarchism what National Socialism was to socialism. Comrade Grumpy Aug 2012 #32
Well, we can play those word games all day. MADem Aug 2012 #33
You must have a curious definition of anarchism. Comrade Grumpy Aug 2012 #36
Like I said, we can play those word games all day. MADem Aug 2012 #41
FBI definition tama Aug 2012 #43
leftists have faced much more severe repression in other countries BOG PERSON Aug 2012 #11
Sure - no doubt about that TBF Aug 2012 #14
I take it you are not of the left? Comrade Grumpy Aug 2012 #37
British India once faced a threat from a noted Anarchist...his name was Gandhi. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2012 #31
Wise man: tama Aug 2012 #47
what a pious little twerp BOG PERSON Aug 2012 #49
Bad day? tama Aug 2012 #51
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Gandhi Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2012 #52
it was reported the FBI discovered an anarchist onethatcares Aug 2012 #35
My guess is that RED lost it's mojo nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #40
Was there a news story that started this or what happened? limpyhobbler Aug 2012 #46
There been lately news stories tama Aug 2012 #48
I know several "anarchists". Their closest other associates, around here, are Libertarians. There patrice Aug 2012 #54
At the demostration that launched Occupy Turku, Finland tama Aug 2012 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Anarchists? We don't hav...»Reply #43