Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Rachel just talked about this! leftieNanner May 2019 #1
+1 Irishxs May 2019 #2
Yeah, I just edited my post to say Ilsa May 2019 #3
👏👏👏 Irishxs May 2019 #7
Lol buncha dumb mutherfuckers... Volaris May 2019 #17
I saw the same broadcast, and I don't think that's what Mueller stated in the report. Texin May 2019 #30
Well stated! Vinnie From Indy May 2019 #31
Rachel seems to be the first person to see it. RVN VET71 May 2019 #38
Rachel used Amy K's subtle questioning of barr, to open up a direct empedocles May 2019 #5
Imagine Rachael as a Senator !!!!!!!!!!! pangaia May 2019 #13
In my wettest dreams , she would decide she's made quite enough corporate monies, Volaris May 2019 #19
Olbermann as Press Sec. Can you imagine that??? pangaia May 2019 #24
I've been asking this all day manor321 May 2019 #4
Rachel suggests that barr is now in a 'box.' empedocles May 2019 #10
His competence does come into question; for babylonsister May 2019 #15
Same here...nt 2naSalit May 2019 #20
Thats why i call him LOW BARR onetexan May 2019 #27
Smarty pants! So glad you're Ilsa May 2019 #12
Also Klobuchar was told by Barr watoos May 2019 #6
I saw that! Ilsa May 2019 #9
Pretty shrewd, I must say. calimary May 2019 #14
Senator Klobuchar wrote to mueller today and asked some questions. onecaliberal May 2019 #8
Loved Rachel's characterizations of Amy's questions and follow-up letter. empedocles May 2019 #11
It was great. I love how Jabba the Hutt told the senator to ask mueller, and she did just that. onecaliberal May 2019 #16
Not sure how that helps. Mueller is likely to give the same ambiguous answers he gave in his report. Hoyt May 2019 #18
Mueller found 4 to 6 examples of criminal obstruction of justice. watoos May 2019 #21
Obstruction isn't going to take trump down. We all watched him obstruct, but GOPers don't care. Hoyt May 2019 #25
No, Mueller did not say he found no evidence of collusion/conspiracy. euphorb May 2019 #22
He needed to say, "Lock the MFer up." Not, "I can't find sufficient evidence." Hoyt May 2019 #26
NRA has another meaning patphil May 2019 #33
Yep, and Mueller is probably a member. Hoyt May 2019 #37
Mueller never was and is not a wimp. Period. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2019 #40
+1, who told Mueller the standard was reasonable doubt vs preponderance of evidence?! uponit7771 May 2019 #29
He would have learned it in law school, if not before. euphorb May 2019 #39
Isn't only preponderance of evidence needed to bring criminal charges? tia uponit7771 May 2019 #41
Prosecutors generally don't bring charges unless they have sufficient evidence to convict. euphorb May 2019 #43
He was referring to the primary charge: that of willfully and knowingly conspiring with Russians. Texin May 2019 #35
Mueller plays long game & maybe you forget the 14 criminal referrals Mueller made, only 2 are known. Bernardo de La Paz May 2019 #42
Not hard to always win in court, if you only prosecute when there is no doubt whatsoever. Hoyt May 2019 #44
I sure as hell hope so. mountain grammy May 2019 #23
Rachel and I are so often on teh same page ... here's me, last night at 6pm ... mr_lebowski May 2019 #28
Yeah, I think Barr stepped in it. patphil May 2019 #32
Hah! shanti May 2019 #34
Mueller refers to copious evidence of criminal wrongdoing and he has referred indictments Texin May 2019 #36
Mueller is a Rethuglican. I doubt he tricked Barr into anything. nt MadDAsHell May 2019 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Holy crap! Did Mueller tr...»Reply #16