Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Rachel pointed out the meaning to Chairman Nadler's methodologically extending deadlines. [View all]UniteFightBack
(8,231 posts)10. I don't think it will be quick but it's going to be the only option. nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Rachel pointed out the meaning to Chairman Nadler's methodologically extending deadlines. [View all]
Ninga
May 2019
OP
You may be right. The Dotard's escalating arrogant criminal behaviors will not stop.
Ninga
May 2019
#4
I think they are waiting for Mueller's testimony, which they expect within the next couple weeks. nt
pnwmom
May 2019
#20
I do agree with this approach. It's very important to follow procedure. However, if it gets caught
UniteFightBack
May 2019
#2
It's going to be in the court system for lengthy periods of time regardless.
TwilightZone
May 2019
#5
What other Watergate-related rulings did the Supreme Court make before impeachment
onenote
May 2019
#36
The point of my post was that people expect it to take 2 years for the courts to rule on Congress'
onenote
May 2019
#38
The possibility that a court might respond positively to a request to expedite a ruling
StarfishSaver
May 2019
#39
Nadler and Pelosi know their shit. I'm glad neither one has aspirations to higher office
ehrnst
May 2019
#9
...and while we're giving them every chance, the clock keeps ticking which is in their favor.
Nevermypresident
May 2019
#16
Can you explain what "judicial process" you are referring to? My understanding is our
Nevermypresident
May 2019
#21
Example: Nadler files contempt charges for not turning over etc. Judge sez, Nadler you know only
Ninga
May 2019
#25
Thank you. My exception is "two hours" vs. the actual reality of what has transpired so far,i.e.
Nevermypresident
May 2019
#31
The longer the 'methodology' takes, the less likely RBG will be there to rule on it n/t
Ponietz
May 2019
#22
Good catch! Why don't I just go ahead and add Democrats writ large to Congressional Dems
Ninga
May 2019
#28
8 dimensional intergalactic chess. I'm so sick of decades of intergalactic chess.
MadDAsHell
May 2019
#40