Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
I understand that, but an impeachment inquiry strengthens it further manor321 May 2019 #1
You may be right. The Dotard's escalating arrogant criminal behaviors will not stop. Ninga May 2019 #4
The Constitution can't wait. Nt Fiendish Thingy May 2019 #13
I think they are waiting for Mueller's testimony, which they expect within the next couple weeks. nt pnwmom May 2019 #20
I do agree with this approach. It's very important to follow procedure. However, if it gets caught UniteFightBack May 2019 #2
It's going to be in the court system for lengthy periods of time regardless. TwilightZone May 2019 #5
Impeachment fasts tracks everything. nt UniteFightBack May 2019 #7
Normal rules don't apply to Trump. TwilightZone May 2019 #8
I don't think it will be quick but it's going to be the only option. nt UniteFightBack May 2019 #10
The rules under impeachment haven't been tested under Trump Fiendish Thingy May 2019 #14
What do you think can be "fast tracked" that would move more slowly StarfishSaver May 2019 #23
The Nixon subpoena case was decided in around thre months onenote May 2019 #30
That doesn't answer my question StarfishSaver May 2019 #33
What other Watergate-related rulings did the Supreme Court make before impeachment onenote May 2019 #36
I was mistaken StarfishSaver May 2019 #37
The point of my post was that people expect it to take 2 years for the courts to rule on Congress' onenote May 2019 #38
The possibility that a court might respond positively to a request to expedite a ruling StarfishSaver May 2019 #39
i dont see how the courts get involved in impeachment hearings. mopinko May 2019 #15
For the same reason they get involved now. TwilightZone May 2019 #29
if he fails to cooperate, he can still be convinced. mopinko May 2019 #32
Agreed. TwilightZone May 2019 #3
*sigh* yes. We are readers and thinkers and patriots here at DU. Ninga May 2019 #6
It's a very complicated process that we're trying to make simple. TwilightZone May 2019 #11
Nadler and Pelosi know their shit. I'm glad neither one has aspirations to higher office ehrnst May 2019 #9
Agreed. Pelosi and Nadler know what they are doing. empedocles May 2019 #12
...and while we're giving them every chance, the clock keeps ticking which is in their favor. Nevermypresident May 2019 #16
I understand where you are coming from. This Ninga May 2019 #18
Can you explain what "judicial process" you are referring to? My understanding is our Nevermypresident May 2019 #21
Example: Nadler files contempt charges for not turning over etc. Judge sez, Nadler you know only Ninga May 2019 #25
Thank you. My exception is "two hours" vs. the actual reality of what has transpired so far,i.e. Nevermypresident May 2019 #31
Point well made! Now that I've thought about it Ninga May 2019 #35
You're right StarfishSaver May 2019 #41
me too. barbtries May 2019 #17
Yes. Exactly. MineralMan May 2019 #19
The longer the 'methodology' takes, the less likely RBG will be there to rule on it n/t Ponietz May 2019 #22
Most people aren't paying close attention StarfishSaver May 2019 #24
''Tis a mess for sure. Nt Ninga May 2019 #26
When you say: Control-Z May 2019 #27
Good catch! Why don't I just go ahead and add Democrats writ large to Congressional Dems Ninga May 2019 #28
That pretty much covers it. Control-Z May 2019 #34
8 dimensional intergalactic chess. I'm so sick of decades of intergalactic chess. MadDAsHell May 2019 #40
Not intergalactic chess. Just the law and court procedures and practice StarfishSaver May 2019 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rachel pointed out the me...»Reply #10