Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NewJeffCT

(56,848 posts)
15. It shouldn't need to go to the Courts
Tue May 7, 2019, 10:10 AM
May 2019

The law is simple - They SHALL turn over the tax returns or else face fines and possible imprisonment.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

they can ask the courts to fast track, but ultimately the courts have to do so. hlthe2b May 2019 #1
And they have to go through the lower courts first. StarfishSaver May 2019 #16
The Supreme Court that Trump keeps in his back pocket? That Supreme Court? Clash City Rocker May 2019 #2
I don't think Roberts is in trump's back pocket? kentuck May 2019 #4
Agreed one thousand percent blueinredohio May 2019 #6
You trust the man personally responsible for campaign finance law changes favoring the rich? lark May 2019 #11
I don't necessarily trust him as much.... kentuck May 2019 #13
I agree StarfishSaver May 2019 #18
Not sure I do. ooky May 2019 #44
I get that. lark May 2019 #23
"That Supreme Court?" mitch96 May 2019 #35
nooooo Blues Heron May 2019 #3
Be careful. Your post demonstrates the case against us. FBaggins May 2019 #5
I don't think they would look at it in those simplified terms... kentuck May 2019 #9
There isn't any other way to look at it FBaggins May 2019 #12
Define "fishing expedition". kentuck May 2019 #14
You seem to be avoiding the key point. FBaggins May 2019 #39
I agree they made the weakest argument... kentuck May 2019 #40
Lol... with respect, that isn't agreeing. FBaggins May 2019 #46
actually Trump provides us our best argument here dsc May 2019 #41
Why couldn't the IG audit the IRS? kentuck May 2019 #42
I assume they could dsc May 2019 #45
This is a Separation of Powers Issue ScratchCat May 2019 #7
It is also about the powers of each branch within the Separation of Powers. kentuck May 2019 #10
But, of course, Congress DOES have that right, ingrained in the Constitution StarfishSaver May 2019 #19
Good analogy! kentuck May 2019 #21
It is just that, isn't it? StarfishSaver May 2019 #25
They will hand out fines. 2020 is our only hope. sarcasmo May 2019 #8
Who do you think is going to "hand out fines"? onenote May 2019 #20
It shouldn't need to go to the Courts NewJeffCT May 2019 #15
Yes, it is the law. kentuck May 2019 #17
Funny thing about due process -- penalties/imprisonment aren't unilaterally imposed in the US onenote May 2019 #22
Yes NewJeffCT May 2019 #24
Its a given that the DOJ isn't going to charge Mnuchin for following DOJ guidance onenote May 2019 #27
No need for court delays at all Fiendish Thingy May 2019 #26
Can you cite to the "previous court" rulings regardig 6103(f)? onenote May 2019 #28
I agree, follow the process before bringing the big hammer. beachbum bob May 2019 #30
Yes. It is likely Mnuchin loses. onenote May 2019 #31
A lawful request by a standing investigating committee really can not be denied. beachbum bob May 2019 #29
exactly nt Grasswire2 May 2019 #33
Of course its a matter that the courts can consider. onenote May 2019 #37
there is no case for the Supreme Court Grasswire2 May 2019 #32
MUST hold firm on this, or it will be seen as weakness to be exploited at every turn. Grasswire2 May 2019 #34
The Treasury is arguing that they are not required to turn over tax returns... kentuck May 2019 #36
There will be no "inherent" contempt proceeding. onenote May 2019 #38
We need to build a much bigger jail in Congress. MoonRiver May 2019 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Congress should fast trac...»Reply #15