Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PRETZEL

(3,245 posts)
9. True,
Thu May 9, 2019, 08:01 AM
May 2019

and it would then have to force the administration to again publicly announce that they would not allow Mueller to testify.

That, at least in my opinion, is a good thing for the Democrats. That makes the optics of Trump and company screaming at the top of their lungs yelling "No Collusion, No Obstruction" as being totally and unequivocally bogus. That changes the conversation to "Innocent people don't hide".

What we do know is that Mueller's testimony as it relates to the report could only be limited to what is unredacted so I don't think there would be many great revelations.

What Mueller could be able to clear up is whether or not Barr shut him down to avoid Mueller finishing his investigation. That's the question I wan answered right now.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Shouldn't the House have ...»Reply #9