Nail meet hammer! (Reply #27) - Democratic Underground

In the discussion thread: I Say Let Them Have Their Abortion Ban [View all]

Response to LonePirate (Reply #24)

Wed May 15, 2019, 11:37 AM

sarabelle (453 posts)

27. Nail meet hammer!

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

43 replies	Author	Time	Post
I Say Let Them Have Their Abortion Ban [View all]	ChoppinBroccoli	May 2019	OP
There is no, "Well, in order to pass this..."' That's done.	ehrnst	May 2019	#1
Yup	Sherman A1	May 2019	#2
Yup. The time to protect Roe v. Wade was in 2016.	MH1	May 2019	#6
"Hillary WAS a flawed candidate, after all"	StarfishSaver	May 2019	#10
LOL.	MH1	May 2019	#14
+1000. (nt)	ehrnst	May 2019	#19
Exactly.	Maven	May 2019	#23
But she didn't INSPIRE every Democrat in America	StarfishSaver	May 2019	#32
Right. Another talking point that needs to die.	Maven	May 2019	#33
We told them	ismnotwasm	May 2019	#16
they care more about "neoliberals"	qazplm135	May 2019	#21
+1000.	ehrnst	May 2019	#25
Exactly	JustAnotherGen	May 2019	#11
Their intent is not to produce more children;	marybourg	May 2019	#3
I think it is more about control than sex.	MH1	May 2019	#7
That pro-forced childbearning movement is deranged about women having "sex for mere pleasure."	ehrnst	May 2019	#17
You are so right (again)	StarfishSaver	May 2019	#20
Their intent is to control women and stop the massive decline in the white birth rate.	LonePirate	May 2019	#24
Nail meet hammer!	sarabelle	May 2019	#27
I believe that you are right	treestar	May 2019	#34
Their intent is to prevent women from having sex.	The Velveteen Ocelot	May 2019	#29
+1	treestar	May 2019	#35
This is cute, but still erases people who get pregnant from the equation.	WhiskeyGrinder	May 2019	#4
Yep. I don't care if there are 100 people lined up to adopt every relinquished infant or older child	ehrnst	May 2019	#18
Forced childbearing is involuntary servitude which is outlawed by the 13th Amendment.	LonePirate	May 2019	#28
I don't think that case could be made, as Roe found that the right resides in the 14th amendment's	ehrnst	May 2019	#31
I admit I didn't think about your argument	Delmette2.0	May 2019	#36
So you are OK with forcing women to have babies they don't want?	comradebillyboy	May 2019	#5
We just don't have enough people who use the services out in the street.	FarPoint	May 2019	#9
I'm not	JustAnotherGen	May 2019	#12
No.	Solly Mack	May 2019	#8
So, you are willing to let them enslave women. Not a big leap for immigrants and POC next...	hlthe2b	May 2019	#13
A Lot Of People Are Missing The Point	ChoppinBroccoli	May 2019	#15
If you have ever raised a child, you would never want to see ANY child raised by someone who feels	ehrnst	May 2019	#22
This message was self-deleted by its author	NurseJackie	May 2019	#26
You are reminding me of a time years ago	trixie2	May 2019	#30
You know, if this goes through, they are going to have to legally find a way for men to	smirkymonkey	May 2019	#37
I'm just gonna assume you are a man.	Raine1967	May 2019	#38
Amen, Raine1967.	demmiblue	May 2019	#39
Thanks. For years we were told that abortion is a wedge issue.	Raine1967	May 2019	#40
They don't care	shanti	May 2019	#41
No. And I am glad to see how many posters are fighting back on this...	Hekate	May 2019	#42
Actually, the evangelical's reckless sex education policies created this mess.	Initech	May 2019	#43

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.