You know, if this goes through, they are going to have to legally find a way for men to (Reply #37)

In the discussion thread: I Say Let Them Have Their Abortion Ban [View all]

Response to ChoppinBroccoli (Original post)

Wed May 15, 2019, 12:56 PM

37. You know, if this goes through, they are going to have to legally find a way for men to

take responsibility for the children they father, financially and otherwise. They can positively prove paternity through DNA tests, so once this goes into fully swing I have a feeling that a lot of men aren't going to be very happy about this either.

Who do they think all these women are having sex with anyway? Do men really think they are going to have string-free sex after this with no repercussions?

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

43 replies	Author	Time	Post
I Say Let Them Have Their Abortion Ban [View all]	ChoppinBroccoli	May 2019	OP
There is no, "Well, in order to pass this..."' That's done.	ehrnst	May 2019	#1
Yup	Sherman A1	May 2019	#2
Yup. The time to protect Roe v. Wade was in 2016.	MH1	May 2019	#6
"Hillary WAS a flawed candidate, after all"	StarfishSaver	May 2019	#10
LOL.	MH1	May 2019	#14
+1000. (nt)	ehrnst	May 2019	#19
Exactly.	Maven	May 2019	#23
But she didn't INSPIRE every Democrat in America	StarfishSaver	May 2019	#32
Right. Another talking point that needs to die.	Maven	May 2019	#33
We told them	ismnotwasm	May 2019	#16
they care more about "neoliberals"	qazplm135	May 2019	#21
+1000.	ehrnst	May 2019	#25
Exactly	JustAnotherGen	May 2019	#11
Their intent is not to produce more children;	marybourg	May 2019	#3
I think it is more about control than sex.	MH1	May 2019	#7
That pro-forced childbearning movement is deranged about women having "sex for mere pleasure."	ehrnst	May 2019	#17
You are so right (again)	StarfishSaver	May 2019	#20
Their intent is to control women and stop the massive decline in the white birth rate.	LonePirate	May 2019	#24
Nail meet hammer!	sarabelle	May 2019	#27
I believe that you are right	treestar	May 2019	#34
Their intent is to prevent women from having sex.	The Velveteen Ocelot	May 2019	#29
+1	treestar	May 2019	#35
This is cute, but still erases people who get pregnant from the equation.	WhiskeyGrinder	May 2019	#4
Yep. I don't care if there are 100 people lined up to adopt every relinquished infant or older child	ehrnst	May 2019	#18
Forced childbearing is involuntary servitude which is outlawed by the 13th Amendment.	LonePirate	May 2019	#28
I don't think that case could be made, as Roe found that the right resides in the 14th amendment's	ehrnst	May 2019	#31
I admit I didn't think about your argument	Delmette2.0	May 2019	#36
So you are OK with forcing women to have babies they don't want?	comradebillyboy	May 2019	#5
We just don't have enough people who use the services out in the street.	FarPoint	May 2019	#9
I'm not	JustAnotherGen	May 2019	#12
No.	Solly Mack	May 2019	#8
So, you are willing to let them enslave women. Not a big leap for immigrants and POC next...	hlthe2b	May 2019	#13
A Lot Of People Are Missing The Point	ChoppinBroccoli	May 2019	#15
If you have ever raised a child, you would never want to see ANY child raised by someone who feels	ehrnst	May 2019	#22
This message was self-deleted by its author	NurseJackie	May 2019	#26
You are reminding me of a time years ago	trixie2	May 2019	#30
You know, if this goes through, they are going to have to legally find a way for men to	smirkymonkey	May 2019	#37
I'm just gonna assume you are a man.	Raine1967	May 2019	#38
Amen, Raine1967.	demmiblue	May 2019	#39
Thanks. For years we were told that abortion is a wedge issue.	Raine1967	May 2019	#40
They don't care	shanti	May 2019	#41
No. And I am glad to see how many posters are fighting back on this...	Hekate	May 2019	#42
Actually, the evangelical's reckless sex education policies created this mess.	Initech	May 2019	#43

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.