Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
23. Well, maybe not the SS. The way it worked was this...
Tue May 28, 2019, 06:47 PM
May 2019

My name would be on the voter registration list as Honey Bumble Bee Comb @ 2019 Lovely Ave.

When I showed my DL, which had the name Honey Bumble Comb @ 2019 Lovely Ave., I wouldn't be allowed to vote. The two names had to match exactly.

I forget which one I changed. I guess the registration, since that would have been easier?

I wouldn't have known that, but for a friend who worked at the election polls. She told me to make sure that my names matched exactly.

I did have to change my SS name to match, but that may have been for another reason. I forget. I just remember taking off work to go down to the SS office with certified copy of my divorce papers, which reflected my entire name. Maybe that was for the ACA.

This sort of thing affects a lot of women because of the name change because of marriage. I think Hispanic names vary, too.


K&R UTUSN May 2019 #1
"botched" and "erroneous" are rather charitable terms for crimes against democracy. lagomorph777 May 2019 #2
++ agree, the goal is to keep Dems from voting iluvtennis May 2019 #4
Buh-BYE!!! calimary May 2019 #3
Please pay attention, DUers. This is a very big deal considering the hold the repugs have on efhmc May 2019 #5
Many DUers are more stuck in the past than even some Trumpsters IronLionZion May 2019 #6
I wonder how a "suspected non-citizen" is determined. Honeycombe8 May 2019 #7
If someone is a registered Democrat, then they're not a US citizen IronLionZion May 2019 #8
Texas doesn't have party registration. So they can't use that. Honeycombe8 May 2019 #14
Time and again I see written here and on the internet that people efhmc May 2019 #18
I'm not aware of the SS name angle. I've been working the elections since 08 MagickMuffin May 2019 #20
Well, maybe not the SS. The way it worked was this... Honeycombe8 May 2019 #23
In Tarrant County we aren't trained like that MagickMuffin May 2019 #24
A provisional vote doesn't count, IMO. Honeycombe8 May 2019 #27
Beto deserves some credit Gothmog May 2019 #9
I don't understand. What happened to the elected Sec of State, if Whitley didn't get elected? Honeycombe8 May 2019 #15
Yes, he was appointed but 2/3rds of the Senate rejected him MagickMuffin May 2019 #21
So the Gov pulled a Trump? He apptd an "acting" Sec of State in the post indefinitely? nt Honeycombe8 May 2019 #22
Well he was "acting" until the Senate had a chance to confirm him MagickMuffin May 2019 #25
Never mind. That was my question, to begin with. Why is he there? Honeycombe8 May 2019 #26
David Whitley resigned, he is no longer there MagickMuffin May 2019 #28
Ohhhhh. LOL. Well, I guess we beat that dead horse enough. LOL. Thanks.nt Honeycombe8 May 2019 #29
This malaise May 2019 #16
+1 dalton99a May 2019 #17
Good link. Thanks. efhmc May 2019 #19
bon voyage, MAGAt nt NCjack May 2019 #10
Election theft is a major fascistic tactic for getting power. Hortensis May 2019 #11
God I hope I live long enough James48 May 2019 #12
Seems Rethugs CDerekGo May 2019 #13
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Texas secretary of state ...»Reply #23