Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Grasswire2

(13,565 posts)
25. exactly. Karl Rove got him with a bamboozle.
Wed May 29, 2019, 12:41 PM
May 2019

Rove was excellent at that kind of trick, from the time he worked for Bush Sr. in TX where he did something similar to win an election.

There was plenty of talk throughout his rise to power about W and cocaine. He did some unexplained community service. Lots of strings to pull, but the stories never made it to the national conversation.

Regarding George and the draft, I did some research in the runup to the election to identify the poor fellow from Midland TX who went to Vietnam in W's place. The person most likely to have replaced him was killed in a rice paddy on his first day there. I have the name tucked away somewhere.

In addition to avoiding Vietnam by getting into the Texas Air National Guard by his daddy's privilege, W went AWOL from his duties. He simply stopped showing up. In wartime. THAT info should have kept him from winning an election. Plenty of citizen investigators put the proof together. A pig farmer in Iowa did the deep dive reseasch and found his records. Dozens of us did everything we could to break that story in the national press. On the Friday before Election Day, Senator Bob Kerrey called a press conference where he planned to ask George W. to explain his absence from duty to the American people. On that day, A FOX affiliate reporter in New England broke the story of W's old DUI. And that obliterated the AWOL story. Karl Rove was a master at obliterating bad news with other news. It's unsettling that Rove is now working with Brad Parscale on the Trump campaign.

There we are.

Hope the Guardian doesn't get burned on this the way they did on the Manafort/Assange enough May 2019 #1
Unnnnn, I'm starting to believe the outlets ... the Cohen story was true but the Mueller team ... uponit7771 May 2019 #2
I don't think that guy represented Mueller. gldstwmn May 2019 #3
Bingo! BadgerMom May 2019 #13
Let's hope this is legit and hope the leak forces more. Grasswire2 May 2019 #4
Keep Dan Rather in mind, though..... nt Grasswire2 May 2019 #5
Good Advice.... ewagner May 2019 #20
I have always believed Dan Rather's words were the truth. They vilified him with the document. usaf-vet May 2019 #23
exactly. Karl Rove got him with a bamboozle. Grasswire2 May 2019 #25
Rec 100 times EveHammond13 May 2019 #6
Holy shit! We all know it happened but to see it written like this is still startling. Pepsidog May 2019 #7
Cowardly Defeatists cautioning we need to move slowly to build a convincing case, in 3,2,1... Fiendish Thingy May 2019 #8
+1 Laura PourMeADrink May 2019 #24
I'll be watching this story closely medyhar May 2019 #9
If this story is true, Mueller also needs to provide the House with a copy of his draft indictment. Lonestarblue May 2019 #10
Very worthy questions. They deserve to be asked AND answered under oath. calimary May 2019 #11
It would also force the GOP to deal with it one way, or another. nt Progressive Jones May 2019 #18
Not Hidden -- just Redacted charliea May 2019 #12
Welcome to DU. Irrelevant? Hardly! lagomorph777 May 2019 #15
Problem is Mueller clearly said today that under the DOJ memo, revealing a sealed indictment would Nevermypresident May 2019 #26
Under oath and in public. BadgerMom May 2019 #14
My bet is Barr Curtis May 2019 #16
It is all tittilating marketing for the new book. debsy May 2019 #17
Wouldn't all of Mueller's electronic files be property of the US Congress? nt Progressive Jones May 2019 #19
Not under the current law. They belong to the DOJ tymorial May 2019 #22
K&R UTUSN May 2019 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Guardian has viewed d...»Reply #25