Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ACLU wins ruling shutting down drumpf's fake "emergency" to build the wall [View all]hlthe2b
(102,234 posts)9. More details: Trump's 'Big, Beautiful' Wall Crumbles in Court
it looks like Sierra Club was involved as well.
https://www.aclu.org/blog/immigrants-rights/ice-and-border-patrol-abuses/trumps-big-beautiful-wall-crumbles-court
From the beginning of his campaign for president, Donald Trump claimed that he was going to build a wall along the southern border. He said nobody builds walls better than me. He said the wall would be big and beautiful. He said someone else would pay for it. And he said it would be built so fast that your head would spin.
Last night, for the first time, a federal judge made clear to President Trump he couldnt get his wall by illegally diverting taxpayer money.
The judges ruling comes in an ACLU lawsuit on behalf of the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition (SBCC). Together, the Sierra Club and SBCC represent the communities who live in, protect, and treasure the lands and communities along our southern border. For years, these communities have engaged in the democratic process and successfully persuaded their congressional representatives to deny President Trump funding to build his wall.
Our lawsuit centers on the question of whether the president abused his power to divert funds for a border wall Congress denied him. Unfortunately for President Trump, the Constitution is clear on the matter: only Congress has the power to decide how taxpayer funds are spent. And Congress, like border communities, said no to the Presidents wall.
Congress didnt bow to Trumps pressure even after he caused the longest government shutdown in U.S. history over his demands for billions of dollars for his wall. Congress allocated only a fraction of the money that Trump demanded, and imposed restrictions on where and how quickly any border barriers could be built.
In a blatant abuse of power meant to circumvent Congress, President Trump declared a national emergency on February 15, 2019, and announced he would illegally divert $6.7 billion from military construction and other accounts for the border wall project.
From the beginning, the emergency was obviously a sham. Trump said as much himself when he declared the emergency, saying he didnt need to do this but hed prefer to build the wall much faster. He added that he declared a national emergency because he was not happy that Congress skimped on the wall by denying him the billions he demanded.
Despite this, the Trump administration tried to argue in court last Friday that Congress never actually denied President Trump the billions of dollars he is now trying to take from the military. The court rejected the administrations argument, reminding the administration that the reality is that Congress was presented withand declined to granta $5.7 billion request for border barrier construction.
The courts ruling blocks the sections of wall that the Trump administration announced would be built with military pay and pension funds. It also invites us to ask the court to block additional projects as they are announced in the future. The judge emphasized the governments commitment to inform the court immediately about future decisions to build.
It may be easy to ridicule President Trumps desperation for a border wall an absurd and xenophobic campaign promise for which he has only himself to blame. But as pointless and wasteful as it may be, Trumps campaign promise now threatens to cause irreparable and real damage to our constitutional checks and balances, the rule of law, border communities, and the environment.
The wall is part of an exclusionary agenda that President Trump has targeted, over and over, at people of color. From his notorious Muslim Ban, to his efforts to eliminate protections for immigrants from Haiti, Sudan, Nicaragua, and El Salvador, courts have found evidence that President Trump harbors an animus against non-white, non-European immigrants. Trump has repeatedly justified his wall by lying about border communities, falsely claiming that America needs a wall.
Border communities know firsthand that walls are dangerous and wasteful. They divide neighborhoods, worsen dangerous flooding, destroy lands and wildlife, and waste resources. As our clients explained to the court, we are a community that is safe, that supports migrants, that works well together and supports one another, that is worthy of existence. What border communities truly need is infrastructure and investment, not militarization and isolation.
The courts order is a vindication of border communities advocacy for themselves, and of our Constitutions separation of powers. As the court wrote, Congresss absolute control over federal expenditureseven when that control may frustrate the desires of the Executive Branch regarding initiatives it views as importantis not a bug in our constitutional system. It is a feature of that system, and an essential one.
Last night, for the first time, a federal judge made clear to President Trump he couldnt get his wall by illegally diverting taxpayer money.
The judges ruling comes in an ACLU lawsuit on behalf of the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition (SBCC). Together, the Sierra Club and SBCC represent the communities who live in, protect, and treasure the lands and communities along our southern border. For years, these communities have engaged in the democratic process and successfully persuaded their congressional representatives to deny President Trump funding to build his wall.
Our lawsuit centers on the question of whether the president abused his power to divert funds for a border wall Congress denied him. Unfortunately for President Trump, the Constitution is clear on the matter: only Congress has the power to decide how taxpayer funds are spent. And Congress, like border communities, said no to the Presidents wall.
Congress didnt bow to Trumps pressure even after he caused the longest government shutdown in U.S. history over his demands for billions of dollars for his wall. Congress allocated only a fraction of the money that Trump demanded, and imposed restrictions on where and how quickly any border barriers could be built.
In a blatant abuse of power meant to circumvent Congress, President Trump declared a national emergency on February 15, 2019, and announced he would illegally divert $6.7 billion from military construction and other accounts for the border wall project.
From the beginning, the emergency was obviously a sham. Trump said as much himself when he declared the emergency, saying he didnt need to do this but hed prefer to build the wall much faster. He added that he declared a national emergency because he was not happy that Congress skimped on the wall by denying him the billions he demanded.
Despite this, the Trump administration tried to argue in court last Friday that Congress never actually denied President Trump the billions of dollars he is now trying to take from the military. The court rejected the administrations argument, reminding the administration that the reality is that Congress was presented withand declined to granta $5.7 billion request for border barrier construction.
The courts ruling blocks the sections of wall that the Trump administration announced would be built with military pay and pension funds. It also invites us to ask the court to block additional projects as they are announced in the future. The judge emphasized the governments commitment to inform the court immediately about future decisions to build.
It may be easy to ridicule President Trumps desperation for a border wall an absurd and xenophobic campaign promise for which he has only himself to blame. But as pointless and wasteful as it may be, Trumps campaign promise now threatens to cause irreparable and real damage to our constitutional checks and balances, the rule of law, border communities, and the environment.
The wall is part of an exclusionary agenda that President Trump has targeted, over and over, at people of color. From his notorious Muslim Ban, to his efforts to eliminate protections for immigrants from Haiti, Sudan, Nicaragua, and El Salvador, courts have found evidence that President Trump harbors an animus against non-white, non-European immigrants. Trump has repeatedly justified his wall by lying about border communities, falsely claiming that America needs a wall.
Border communities know firsthand that walls are dangerous and wasteful. They divide neighborhoods, worsen dangerous flooding, destroy lands and wildlife, and waste resources. As our clients explained to the court, we are a community that is safe, that supports migrants, that works well together and supports one another, that is worthy of existence. What border communities truly need is infrastructure and investment, not militarization and isolation.
The courts order is a vindication of border communities advocacy for themselves, and of our Constitutions separation of powers. As the court wrote, Congresss absolute control over federal expenditureseven when that control may frustrate the desires of the Executive Branch regarding initiatives it views as importantis not a bug in our constitutional system. It is a feature of that system, and an essential one.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
23 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
ACLU wins ruling shutting down drumpf's fake "emergency" to build the wall [View all]
Takket
Jun 2019
OP
Great NEWS! I've aleady donated twice this year to ACLU, but hey folks if you can, please join me!
hlthe2b
Jun 2019
#6
The ACLU should change their slogan to "Getting shit done when an impotent Congress won't!"
NightWatcher
Jun 2019
#21