Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: David Corn. 9700 "likes," 2800 retweets of his response to the WSJ. [View all]calimary
(81,085 posts)17. David Corn - for the WIN.
What? Like thats something bad or disgusting or non-sexist? Somebody who doesnt rape and brag about it? Somebody who isnt a congenital pathological liar? Like thats somehow a bad thing? Somebody who is so vile, vulgar, and untrustworthy that even you wouldnt behave that way and certainly wouldnt want your children to follow that example?
Then what does that say about YOU, WSJ Editorial Board???
Dammit, I just keep on getting dragged back to that same damn question. WHAT does that say about those who cling to him and somehow manage to justify supporting him?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
David Corn. 9700 "likes," 2800 retweets of his response to the WSJ. [View all]
Miles Archer
Jun 2019
OP
Ed board of WSJ particularly hard right for 0.1 pcent, unlike staff who report pretty straight. . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jun 2019
#9
Do you believe this "lock step" shit? It's more RW projection. Watching the Dem Debates invalidates!
TheBlackAdder
Jun 2019
#32
Yep. The goal of oligarchs is to keep people working so much, they won't challenge the system.
TheBlackAdder
Jun 2019
#34
Those that deny even to themselves & over-compensate are the most screwed up. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jun 2019
#11
A.c.t.u.a.l.l.y, Democrats are offering a lot to appeal to tRump voters if they'd think about it.
Bernardo de La Paz
Jun 2019
#8
This WJS Tweet Offers More Damning Evidence How the Murdochs have Seriously Damaged Our Country
dlk
Jun 2019
#14
Exactly. Murdochs have helped destroy this country. Why hasn't this been said more often?
Pepsidog
Jun 2019
#16
True, but to beat an incumbent, we need more than "I'm not him." That doesn't work. nt
Honeycombe8
Jun 2019
#46
And David Corn and the Staff at MotherJones are more credible than the right wing rag called the WSJ
turbinetree
Jun 2019
#53