General Discussion

calimary

(81,085 posts)

17. David Corn - for the WIN.

Sun Jun 30, 2019, 11:20 AM

Jun 2019

What? Like that’s something bad or disgusting or non-sexist? Somebody who doesn’t rape and brag about it? Somebody who isn’t a congenital pathological liar? Like that’s somehow a bad thing? Somebody who is so vile, vulgar, and untrustworthy that even you wouldn’t behave that way and certainly wouldn’t want your children to follow that example?

Then what does that say about YOU, WSJ Editorial Board???

Dammit, I just keep on getting dragged back to that same damn question. WHAT does that say about those who cling to him and somehow manage to justify supporting him?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

56 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

David Corn. 9700 "likes," 2800 retweets of his response to the WSJ. [View all] Miles Archer Jun 2019 OP

K & R...for truth...nt Wounded Bear Jun 2019 #1

That any editorial board can post this shit should shock everyone malaise Jun 2019 #4

Ed board of WSJ particularly hard right for 0.1 pcent, unlike staff who report pretty straight. . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2019 #9

Hard right should not mean condoning this vile scumbag malaise Jun 2019 #13

And the Murdoch family does this intentionally. sharedvalues Jun 2019 #31

WSJ is a propaganda tool of Rupert Murdoch sharedvalues Jun 2019 #30

Yep malaise Jun 2019 #37

Get thee to the greatest page malaise Jun 2019 #2

Do you believe this "lock step" shit? It's more RW projection. Watching the Dem Debates invalidates! TheBlackAdder Jun 2019 #32

No I don't believe that lock step shit malaise Jun 2019 #33

Yep. The goal of oligarchs is to keep people working so much, they won't challenge the system. TheBlackAdder Jun 2019 #34

Student debt lunatica Jun 2019 #41

Well let me tell you what's coming next malaise Jun 2019 #42

I'm relieved that I'm out of the employment rat race lunatica Jun 2019 #45

We had it easy malaise Jun 2019 #51

On the mark! 👏 Funtatlaguy Jun 2019 #3

The WSJ argument is nonsense infinite_wisdom Jun 2019 #5

Who owns the WSJ? the same guy who owns Fox Perseus Jun 2019 #7

The Alien Kid Berwyn Jun 2019 #50

Exactly, and one would think.... KY_EnviroGuy Jun 2019 #12

Its fucking tiresome Cosmocat Jun 2019 #15

Yes. Exactly LiberalLovinLug Jun 2019 #43

Yep more bothsidesism uponit7771 Jun 2019 #49

Post removed Post removed Jun 2019 #6

Those that deny even to themselves & over-compensate are the most screwed up. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2019 #11

You have crystallized my thoughts exactly. dchill Jun 2019 #18

A.c.t.u.a.l.l.y, Democrats are offering a lot to appeal to tRump voters if they'd think about it. Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2019 #8

+1,000 malaise Jun 2019 #20

Great post! Poiuyt Jun 2019 #35

K n R for visibility. Earth Bound Misfit Jun 2019 #10

This WJS Tweet Offers More Damning Evidence How the Murdochs have Seriously Damaged Our Country dlk Jun 2019 #14

Exactly. Murdochs have helped destroy this country. Why hasn't this been said more often? Pepsidog Jun 2019 #16

David Corn - for the WIN. calimary Jun 2019 #17

It is primary season PatSeg Jun 2019 #19

And they're off to the horse races for the next year and a half! lunatica Jun 2019 #44

And as a result, PatSeg Jul 2019 #56

Yup! Every other petty difference among the Dems is just chaff. FailureToCommunicate Jun 2019 #21

P.S. More people voted AGAINST Trump than FOR him rocktivity Jun 2019 #22

Yes, the Democratic will offer a human to a terrible, inhuman man. RVN VET71 Jun 2019 #23

WSJ sounds super stupid Achilleaze Jun 2019 #24

! KG Jun 2019 #25

Corn could have added Captain Zero Jun 2019 #26

If I had a subscription to WSJ, I would cancel it after that editorial FakeNoose Jun 2019 #27

correction. barbtries Jun 2019 #28

Epic! onetexan Jun 2019 #29

Zing!!! oasis Jun 2019 #36

"Democrats march in lockstep with the left" is a false premise. n/t MarcA Jun 2019 #38

A false premise on a couple of levels. nt Progressive Jones Jun 2019 #54

Kicked. (nt) Paladin Jun 2019 #39

You forgot "sadistic" David. BigmanPigman Jun 2019 #40

True, but to beat an incumbent, we need more than "I'm not him." That doesn't work. nt Honeycombe8 Jun 2019 #46

I hope we aren't offering the deplorables ANYTHING Takket Jun 2019 #47

K&R onecaliberal Jun 2019 #48

WSJ (AKA) The Wizard Jun 2019 #52

And David Corn and the Staff at MotherJones are more credible than the right wing rag called the WSJ turbinetree Jun 2019 #53

he forgot adult instead of a baby man. pansypoo53219 Jun 2019 #55