Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: William Barr on Epstein: "I am recused from that matter. . . " [View all]gratuitous
(82,849 posts)45. Sounds like a pretty flimsy pretext to me
But if working at Kirkland Ellis is a disqualifier for overseeing the Epstein "matter," that might start eliminating a LOT of high-ranking DOJ attorneys. I wonder if anyone on the case at the Southern District's U.S. Attorney's office worked at Kirkland Ellis, and now those persons might have to recuse themselves, as well?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Plus my dad gave Epstein a job teaching young children when Epstein was a college dropout
MaryMagdaline
Jul 2019
#3
When I read that he taught high school girls math and physics at some high brow boarding school.
Blue_true
Jul 2019
#34
That's a level of need for recusal which Barr (and Sessions, and other AGs) does not (do not)
RockRaven
Jul 2019
#10
Oh man, he looks hot and bothered. Or at least that is the phrase we used back in the day before
japple
Jul 2019
#19
oh, ho ho ho??? NOW this motherfucker is recused... Somebody is going to jail... LOTS of somebodies.
Afromania
Jul 2019
#20