Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

drray23

(7,627 posts)

13. Found the transcript.

Reply to FBaggins (Reply #7)

Wed Jul 24, 2019, 10:07 PM

Jul 2019

Jerry Nadler: 03:25 Is it correct that if you had concluded that the president committed the crime of obstruction, you could not publicly state that in your report or here today?

Robert Mueller: 03:34 Well, I would say you, I could… The statement would be that you would not indict, and you would not indict because under the OLC opinion, a sitting president, excuse me, cannot be indicted, be unconstitutional.

It is at
https://www.rev.com/blog/robert-mueller-testimony-transcript-house-congressional-testimony

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why did Mueller say that going against the olc opinion would be unconstitutional? [View all] drray23 Jul 2019 OP

Ultimately the Supreme Court is the final authority but everyone can have their own belief... PoliticAverse Jul 2019 #1

Where does he say that? FBaggins Jul 2019 #2

He explicitly said so during the hearing. drray23 Jul 2019 #5

Again... can you point to where? FBaggins Jul 2019 #7

I heard him say it as well. Nevermypresident Jul 2019 #10

I was listening on Sirius xm driving to work. drray23 Jul 2019 #11

That's why I was asking FBaggins Jul 2019 #12

Found the transcript. drray23 Jul 2019 #13

As I said above... that's not at all what you described FBaggins Jul 2019 #16

Because at this time there is no legal authority to the contrary. The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2019 #3

Did he use the word unconstitutional? Claritie Pixie Jul 2019 #4

Yes explicitly which is what surprised me.nt. drray23 Jul 2019 #6

I didn't hear that, thanks. Claritie Pixie Jul 2019 #8

I don't think he put it that way, elleng Jul 2019 #9

the Constitution provides a way to convict a President Hermit-The-Prog Jul 2019 #14

He didn't specifically say that EffieBlack Jul 2019 #15