Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

klook

(12,154 posts)

46. Correct. He clarified that the OLC opinion was the reason they couldn't

Reply to cilla4progress (Reply #41)

Wed Jul 24, 2019, 10:13 PM

Jul 2019

consider indicting a sitting president. He did not come back to say there was no justification to indict Trump, just that that was not an avenue open to the Special Counsel. Hardly exculpatory.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This is bad for Dems!!!111!!: [View all] Kingofalldems Jul 2019 OP

How is this bad for democrats? redstatebluegirl Jul 2019 #1

Edited. Kingofalldems Jul 2019 #4

Sarcasm. It's actually great for Democrats. Qutzupalotl Jul 2019 #8

"Republicans look flustered and crazy." trev Jul 2019 #27

Even so, every time a Republican is questioning or haranguing Mueller... greatauntoftriplets Jul 2019 #29

I noticed that! skamaria Jul 2019 #43

How so?? riversedge Jul 2019 #2

Sarcasm written at the bottom of the post Bradical79 Jul 2019 #34

????? robleb Jul 2019 #3

It's a sarcastic statement. lunatica Jul 2019 #32

It says sarcasm at the bottom of the post Bradical79 Jul 2019 #33

I Suggest We Treat this as a Serious Matter McKim Jul 2019 #40

On the contrary n/t malaise Jul 2019 #5

Come on, you know me. Kingofalldems Jul 2019 #10

Hehehehehe malaise Jul 2019 #11

This message was self-deleted by its author irisblue Jul 2019 #6

I wish people would read threads before alerting, and understand sarcasm. Agschmid Jul 2019 #7

Yes irisblue Jul 2019 #9

+1. n/t rzemanfl Jul 2019 #15

Yes. greatauntoftriplets Jul 2019 #30

Bad for Bbbbbbarr. Kid Berwyn Jul 2019 #12

My goodness, I actually had to add the sarcasm thing. Kingofalldems Jul 2019 #13

Oh you added it after people started commenting, I was about to say maybe it needs to be bigger. dewsgirl Jul 2019 #21

Someone here once posted that ... Whiskeytide Jul 2019 #31

Actually it shows that Mueller wanted to indict . . . Iliyah Jul 2019 #14

I don't understand. Control-Z Jul 2019 #16

Refresh. Kingofalldems Jul 2019 #17

Got it! Control-Z Jul 2019 #20

It's ALWAYS bad for the Dems. GoCubsGo Jul 2019 #18

I keep wondering if others are listening to the same hearing as I am Dennis Donovan Jul 2019 #19

What did mueller mean by that last statement? Fullduplexxx Jul 2019 #22

I believe it had to do with going outside the report. Kingofalldems Jul 2019 #23

a HUGH loss for the democrat party !1!!11!! Blue Owl Jul 2019 #24

Seriesly hugh!!1! Scurrilous Jul 2019 #44

Didn't Mueller take this statement back at the beginning of the 2nd BigmanPigman Jul 2019 #25

Yes dem4decades Jul 2019 #26

That means that the OP title is not sarcastic now. BigmanPigman Jul 2019 #28

How's this? Kingofalldems Jul 2019 #36

She asked great questions! BigmanPigman Jul 2019 #45

And this: Kingofalldems Jul 2019 #37

Logically, an act(s) doesn't become a "crime" only upon a prosecutor indicting you for that act(s). no_hypocrisy Jul 2019 #35

That Devin Nunes Timmygoat Jul 2019 #38

Yes he is trDump's chump ! magicarpet Jul 2019 #39

Mueller modified his answer to Lieu cilla4progress Jul 2019 #41

Correct. He clarified that the OLC opinion was the reason they couldn't klook Jul 2019 #46

Meantime, at 1211 Avenue of the Americas studios... lambchopp59 Jul 2019 #42