Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Chellee

(2,091 posts)
27. How would we pay for the Freedom Dividend?
Tue Aug 13, 2019, 06:09 PM
Aug 2019

It would be easier than you might think. Andrew proposes funding the Freedom Dividend by consolidating some welfare programs and implementing a Value-Added Tax (VAT) of 10%. Current welfare and social program beneficiaries would be given a choice between their current benefits or $1,000 cash unconditionally – most would prefer cash with no restriction.

A Value-Added Tax (VAT) is a tax on the production of goods or services a business produces. It is a fair tax and it makes it much harder for large corporations, who are experts at hiding profits and income, to avoid paying their fair share. A VAT is nothing new. 160 out of 193 countries in the world already have a Value-Added Tax or something similar, including all of Europe which has an average VAT of 20 percent.

The means to pay for the Freedom Dividend will come from 4 sources:

1. Current spending. We currently spend between $500 and $600 billion a year on welfare programs, food stamps, disability and the like. This reduces the cost of the Freedom Dividend because people already receiving benefits would have a choice but would be ineligible to receive the full $1,000 in addition to current benefits.

Additionally, we currently spend over one trillion dollars on health care, incarceration, homelessness services and the like. We would save $100 – 200+ billion as people would take better care of themselves and avoid the emergency room, jail, and the street and would generally be more functional. The Freedom Dividend would pay for itself by helping people avoid our institutions, which is when our costs shoot up. Some studies have shown that $1 to a poor parent will result in as much as $7 in cost-savings and economic growth.

2. A VAT. Our economy is now incredibly vast at $19 trillion, up $4 trillion in the last 10 years alone. A VAT at half the European level would generate $800 billion in new revenue. A VAT will become more and more important as technology improves because you cannot collect income tax from robots or software.

3. New revenue. Putting money into the hands of American consumers would grow the economy. The Roosevelt Institute projected that the economy would grow by approximately $2.5 trillion and create 4.6 million new jobs. This would generate approximately $800 – 900 billion in new revenue from economic growth and activity.

4. Taxes on top earners and pollution. By removing the Social Security cap, implementing a financial transactions tax, and ending the favorable tax treatment for capital gains/carried interest, we can decrease financial speculation while also funding the Freedom Dividend. We can add to that a carbon fee that will be partially dedicated to funding the Freedom Dividend, making up the remaining balance required to cover the cost of this program.

*From Andrew Yang's website

Jesus Christ in a corduroy sweater-- what the ever lovin' fuck is up with these people? They can't.. TreasonousBastard Aug 2019 #1
It happened to Joe Crowley in nearby NY14. Stinky The Clown Aug 2019 #2
On a day when there was no higher election primary... low turnout. OnDoutside Aug 2019 #3
Yea-- that's how AOC got the job. She claimed Crowley was ignoring the district, which he... TreasonousBastard Aug 2019 #4
Crowley had to go sabbat hunter Aug 2019 #5
Believe me, the voters won't be confused next year when the FEDERAL primaries roll around. George II Aug 2019 #31
Nadler warned about the dangers to people's health after 9-11 JI7 Aug 2019 #6
NY-10 sabbat hunter Aug 2019 #7
Oooooooh! THIS is interesting! Leith Aug 2019 #8
All I need to know, thanks Eliot Rosewater Aug 2019 #9
Same here Leith Aug 2019 #10
Totally thegoose Aug 2019 #11
Yup......not going anywhere...loser. a kennedy Aug 2019 #19
Conservative Right Think Tank. Ok irisblue Aug 2019 #12
GREAT CATCH. Thank you, Leith. And that puts another perspective on Yang, too. n/t pnwmom Aug 2019 #13
That's not the same guy mathematic Aug 2019 #14
You are right, that is not the same guy. FM123 Aug 2019 #16
Rats Leith Aug 2019 #17
except the current picture looks about the same age as the one you found dsc Aug 2019 #18
That's not the same guy. chowder66 Aug 2019 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author comradebillyboy Aug 2019 #30
$1,000 a month for all Americans? Polybius Aug 2019 #20
Universal Basic Income MichMan Aug 2019 #21
The name is understood. How will it be paid for? nt Blue_true Aug 2019 #22
Same as everything else; tax the 1 % MichMan Aug 2019 #24
There are not enough 1%. If they are the only ones taxed, you are Blue_true Aug 2019 #25
How would we pay for the Freedom Dividend? Chellee Aug 2019 #27
I agree that putting more money in the hands of people who spend it grows Blue_true Aug 2019 #28
Not true. They want a VAT to pay for it. dansolo Aug 2019 #32
And extensively panned as a really bad idea. GulfCoast66 Aug 2019 #23
UBI comes with some daunting implementation issues. Blue_true Aug 2019 #29
Challenge smells bad - unfortunately there is Dem precedent empedocles Aug 2019 #26
There's another challenger, too - Lindsey Boylan. George II Aug 2019 #33
All I can find about him is that he took a leave of absence from Harvard Law School.... George II Aug 2019 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Someone is primarying Jer...»Reply #27