Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Acting Director of National Intelligence should not be permitted to defy a subpoena... [View all]kentuck
(110,950 posts)11. They are "co-equal" for the purpose of governing.
In reality, the Founders thought the Legislature of the People was where the final say would be.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
34 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Acting Director of National Intelligence should not be permitted to defy a subpoena... [View all]
kentuck
Sep 2019
OP
He is violating a statute passed by the Congress and signed by a President...
Thomas Hurt
Sep 2019
#6
On the other hand Congress does have the power of the purse that they can wield and withhold
cstanleytech
Sep 2019
#12
Could the House withhold salary funds for 'acting' directors until they are confirmed
Captain Zero
Sep 2019
#28
Congress can only appropriate money... it can't manage the spending of it directly.
FBaggins
Sep 2019
#24
They could however attache a warning to the money that if its used for x or x instead that
cstanleytech
Sep 2019
#31
Either way they do have the ability to apply pressure with the power of the purse but it
cstanleytech
Sep 2019
#33
He has because they have let him. I am sure there is a politician that can figure out the answer
Maraya1969
Sep 2019
#5
No! Because damn it I am so sick of Democrats saying, "This won't work" "You can't do that"
Maraya1969
Sep 2019
#29