General Discussion

Polybius

(22,135 posts)

67. It barely survived the appellate court (2-1)

Reply to cstanleytech (Reply #56)

Fri Oct 11, 2019, 10:22 PM

Oct 2019

The SC is certain to take it, and it will no doubt be overturned.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

71 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

BREAKING: Appeals Court has REJECTED Trump's appeal of the House Oversight Committee's subpoena for [View all] demmiblue Oct 2019 OP

K & R!!! 50 Shades Of Blue Oct 2019 #1

Rick Wilson on the news joost5 Oct 2019 #42

I'm celebrating a temporary win and you're quoting a temporary ally. 50 Shades Of Blue Oct 2019 #46

You're correct joost5 Oct 2019 #52

When Trump is gone Wilson will go back to attacking Democrats. 50 Shades Of Blue Oct 2019 #53

When Trump is gone Wilson will go back to attacking Democrats. LenaBaby61 Oct 2019 #55

That's how I feel. 50 Shades Of Blue Oct 2019 #58

I could listen to them rail against Trump ALL DAY LONG. They are usually right on that part. NCLefty Oct 2019 #70

Why should they change how they feel about politics? Loki Liesmith Oct 2019 #71

You know what? MyOwnPeace Oct 2019 #66

*gasp* NCLefty Oct 2019 #69

K & R for visibility .... n/t MFGsunny Oct 2019 #2

Big Win for Democracy! Cha Oct 2019 #3

Next stop is SCOTUS? NewJeffCT Oct 2019 #4

En Banc review Sanity Claws Oct 2019 #8

Thanks NewJeffCT Oct 2019 #9

It may go to en banc review. Sanity Claws Oct 2019 #12

When or if it does hit scotus what's your best guess on what will happen? cstanleytech Oct 2019 #56

It barely survived the appellate court (2-1) Polybius Oct 2019 #67

Not necessarily - it's not automatic StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #16

Can either party appeal to SCOTUS Fiendish Thingy Oct 2019 #25

No need for the House to appeal at this point since they prevailed StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #30

Yes, I was wondering why would the Supreme Court even take up this case? There doesn't seem to... SWBTATTReg Oct 2019 #31

I'll be surprised if the Supreme Court took the case StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #47

I was very, very surprised when they granted cert in Bush v. Gore, The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2019 #51

But if they lose an En Banc vote...? Nt Fiendish Thingy Oct 2019 #37

If there's an en banc, whoever loses can appeal, but there's no guarantee the SCt will take it StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #48

And the sole dissenting Judge...? Grins Oct 2019 #62

That's what I was just thinking. I guess we all know how THAT will turn out. Texin Oct 2019 #22

and on to the supreme court, where i'm sure justice will be... aw sh*t.... unblock Oct 2019 #5

Time frame? bluestarone Oct 2019 #10

there's some urgency to the situation, so i would hope not that long. unblock Oct 2019 #11

Stuff like this they do immediately. PoindexterOglethorpe Oct 2019 #32

"immediately" in supreme court time scale can mean a month or few. unblock Oct 2019 #36

US v Nixon - three weeks jberryhill Oct 2019 #43

Bush v Gore was four weeks. PoindexterOglethorpe Oct 2019 #44

oh dear please let's hope the time frame is the only similarity with that case.... unblock Oct 2019 #45

If SCOTUS backs Trump, that's a huge issue for 2020, especially Senate bigbrother05 Oct 2019 #19

Agree.... this could turn out to be really important. NoMoreRepugs Oct 2019 #24

SCOTUS backs Trump means SCOTUS goes rogue. Were are finished as a nation of laws. Pepsidog Oct 2019 #33

We will need the next Dem President to increase the number of justices. wasupaloopa Oct 2019 #38

Absolutely or impeach Kavenaugh for his lying under oath. Not about sex assault but stupid stuff Pepsidog Oct 2019 #40

YES, and thank you for saying that! K&R, nt. druidity33 Oct 2019 #63

AWESOME news! bluestarone Oct 2019 #6

That's a big NYET for Trump underpants Oct 2019 #7

K&R Zoonart Oct 2019 #13

Huge win malaise Oct 2019 #14

This is a BFD StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #15

Glad you're here to explain the importance of some of these decisions. Mike 03 Oct 2019 #29

This is NOT good news Trumpdumper Oct 2019 #17

Definitely need another McCain moment. (like the thumbs down) bluestarone Oct 2019 #23

crossing my fingers and toes. riversedge Oct 2019 #27

A win is a win - and this is a win. A big one StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #49

I bet this is the reason trump wanted to pack the courts. calimary Oct 2019 #18

finally!! subana Oct 2019 #20

hand it over bdamomma Oct 2019 #21

woohoo, yippee, hooray iluvtennis Oct 2019 #26

He was right! So much winning! n/t Bromwell Oct 2019 #28

Hand them over Donnie!! SummerSnow Oct 2019 #34

Confusion comes from NY case dealing with the same issues, but I think NY is a state court matter on Pepsidog Oct 2019 #35

NY case was a federal district court case StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #50

See there's the confusion factor. I thought NY case was Letitia James NY AG who subpoenaed His tax Pepsidog Oct 2019 #57

It it is confusing, isn't it? StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #61

Ok. That makes sense now it was Vance. Thanks for clearing that up. Pepsidog Oct 2019 #64

That was very helpful. Thanks. nt blaze Oct 2019 #65

This message was self-deleted by its author StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #60

Trump judge's dissent is 'extraordinary' dalton99a Oct 2019 #39

Correction: Big win for the country, big win for the rule of law and big win for democracy The Liberal Lion Oct 2019 #41

YAY!!! BlancheSplanchnik Oct 2019 #54

That didn't take long dlk Oct 2019 #59

I don't think they'll take the case. Roberts doesn't want his court to appear biased, and if he napi21 Oct 2019 #68