Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Before attacking the Dems for not including an Article of Impeachment on Bribery, consider this: [View all]calimary
(81,107 posts)19. Totally! But I could think of a hundred charges on which to file impeachment charges.
That said? I will happily take em and not look a gift horse in the mouth (at least not too much).
Grateful weve climbed this mountain. Now, onward to the mountaintop!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
99 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Before attacking the Dems for not including an Article of Impeachment on Bribery, consider this: [View all]
StarfishSaver
Dec 2019
OP
I'd like to see someone look into if Giuliani as a prosecutor ever announced an investigation
brewens
Dec 2019
#1
So you just pop up from your on-the-ground organizing to attack the Democrats
StarfishSaver
Dec 2019
#15
Just reading this. Apologize for you being treated so badly - just for expressing
Laura PourMeADrink
Dec 2019
#84
Messaging isn't ConLaw, but the Dems have given YOU more than enough to use to message on the street
StarfishSaver
Dec 2019
#54
When you read the articles of impeachment, what specifically jumped out at you as far as messaging
BannonsLiver
Dec 2019
#69
Dems aren't holding back evidence, but are giving up evidence that will soon become available
Fiendish Thingy
Dec 2019
#32
Republicans will now argue endless hours on what abuse of power is including false equivalencies. I
uponit7771
Dec 2019
#13
Once articles have been voted on and sent to the Senste for trial, they cannot be amended
Fiendish Thingy
Dec 2019
#27
But didn't you think that Pelosi would never allow an impeachment in the first place?
StarfishSaver
Dec 2019
#35
The record shows that she was firmly against impeachment until the Ukraine events in Aug nt.
Fiendish Thingy
Dec 2019
#41
Totally! But I could think of a hundred charges on which to file impeachment charges.
calimary
Dec 2019
#19
I understand their logic, but the GOP are (and did already) accuse Obama-Biden of the same thing!
Texin
Dec 2019
#24
If they had included bribery and obstruction of justice, those 4 articles would be appropriate
Fiendish Thingy
Dec 2019
#33
If they had included them, you would have found something else to complain about
StarfishSaver
Dec 2019
#36
+1, ICA was written because of Nixon !! The 400 million for Ukraine wasn't for Trump campaign!!
uponit7771
Dec 2019
#72
It can be seen that way, but that's not the way the framers would have seen it...
markpkessinger
Dec 2019
#93