Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
15. This was the genius of Pelosi's move
Thu Jan 2, 2020, 10:22 PM
Jan 2020

One reason Pelosi's "hold back" tactic is brilliant


Had Pelosi just held off sending the Articles, her refusal to move the process forward would have been THE story. The Republicans would have been all over her with a full and enthusiastic assist from the media, who would have spent 24/7 jumping up and down demanding to know when Pelosi would send the Articles to the Senate. Pelosi's "recalcitrance" would have been the ONLY story. In the meantime, Republicans would continue their plan to screw up the process once they got the Articles - and they would have done so with barely any attention because the focus would have been all on Pelosi.

But she was too smart for this. She didn't just hold on to the Articles. She tied her action tight as a knot to the Republican plans to screw up the process, making release of the Articles completely contingent upon the Republicans showing their hand. In the law, we call that a "condition precedent": an event that must occur before a party is required to perform. In this instance, Pelosi made the Republicans revealing the process they plan to use for the trial the condition precedent to her releasing the Articles because, she's explained, she can't refer the Articles until she appoints managers and she can't appoint managers until she knows how the trial will proceed.

By doing it this way, Pelosi ensured that, not only is she not "the bad guy" in this transaction and is not derelict in her duty - since she wants to do her duty but can't do it until the Republicans do theirs - but she also guaranteed that the Republicans can't do their dirt in the dark as they usually do. Every time anyone talks about Pelosi refusing to refer the Articles, they MUST talk about why she's refusing, report on the Republicans refusal to reveal the process they plan to use, and discuss the Republicans' efforts to rig the trial.

As a result, the story is not just about Pelosi holding the Articles, but - and probably moreso - about the Republicans trying to conduct a sham trial.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100212822243
"Stall"? gratuitous Jan 2020 #1
Some items cook best when done slowly. apcalc Jan 2020 #2
It's sort of wild Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2020 #3
That's part of the value of this time out gratuitous Jan 2020 #5
This was the genius of Pelosi's move StarfishSaver Jan 2020 #15
She should announce that an impeachment trail during an election year is too partisan, CrispyQ Jan 2020 #4
Would that assume that Trump is re-elected then? Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2020 #6
Sorry. I was being sarcastic. CrispyQ Jan 2020 #7
Oh Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2020 #14
Also... tgards79 Jan 2020 #8
this one's funny too. maxsolomon Jan 2020 #11
Man we have to get away from impeachment. tgards79 Jan 2020 #9
LOL, good one. maxsolomon Jan 2020 #10
I'm not being funny tgards79 Jan 2020 #12
You should have let the Dems know before they pursued it. maxsolomon Jan 2020 #13
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BTRTN: What Is Pelosi Up ...»Reply #15