Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(42,770 posts)

5. Guess there's also the complication of reduced workload

Thu Apr 30, 2020, 10:08 AM

Apr 2020

too. In better times, say you employed 20 people, and now you only need (and reemploy)10, then the remaining 10 could still be seemed "laid off"?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Unemployment question. Say you worked at a GA bowling [View all] Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2020 OP

Great question SheltieLover Apr 2020 #1

Thanks for those articles! This is all such a complicated mess. Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2020 #8

YW! SheltieLover Apr 2020 #11

My understanding is that if your employer reopens The Velveteen Ocelot Apr 2020 #2

Guess there's also the complication of reduced workload Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2020 #5

I believe TX was one of the states I read about yesterday, dewsgirl Apr 2020 #3

Yet the business themselves could do the employee a favor Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2020 #6

not a chance rampartc Apr 2020 #9

But I thought that a business has no liability if a former Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2020 #10

The way the CARE Act was written forthemiddle Apr 2020 #4